From: Dutch <>
Subject: Re: An incestuous inbred with a beard
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id w15mr1731337qka.25.1509604781991;
Wed, 01 Nov 2017 23:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: An incestuous inbred with a beard
References: <>
From: Dutch <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <N4zKB.39319$G72.9206@fx38.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 06:39:41 UTC
Organization: UsenetServer -
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 23:39:14 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 1347
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1836799142
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 1285
Print Article
Forward Article
popinjay wrote:
> If some Deliverance-looking retard with a long beard went in to buy some nitrate fertilizer, I
think most reasonable merchants would report it.  So why when "Borat" went in to rent a truck, why
didn't it raise a red flag somewhere?  Somebody dropped the ball.

Half the "adult" men in my neighbourhood have beards like that.
> Firing squad for this freak!  No other reasonable option.  Fuck a trial.

He's a potential treasure-trove of intel on how these guys think. Work 
that angle for as long as you can, after that, firing squad's too good 
for him.