From: VegasJerry <jerryst@cox.net>
Subject: Re: MSNBC Terror Analyst Insists, NYC Attack ‘Not Islam,' Could've Been 'Radicalized Catholics'
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.170.83 with SMTP id t80mr5860438qke.20.1509742503618;
Fri, 03 Nov 2017 13:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.31.96.146 with SMTP id u140mr608025vkb.2.1509742503481; Fri,
03 Nov 2017 13:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.216.216.MISMATCH!k31no1852764qta.1!news-out.google.com!r5ni3068qtc.1!nntp.google.com!z50no1870137qtj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 13:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2j3LB.88338$a03.75524@fx42.iad>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.104.6.37; posting-account=Hm3-XAoAAADEywKbjLyIgNX200WVCCV9
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.104.6.37
References: <7t6lvc5p32ph2jugs3nbnd98r9jgfugn7m@4ax.com> <82508960-2ca6-49ec-9b7a-42a8d4ff6c08@googlegroups.com>
<90vmvc1e4vocck1fhpu3s42p2p58qe08mq@4ax.com> <07e55342-481b-489a-9aad-3325ddcbc946@googlegroups.com>
<G1OKB.31758$2w2.9540@fx16.iad> <debb2813-9edb-41b7-95ed-ac0fddc867c0@googlegroups.com>
<2j3LB.88338$a03.75524@fx42.iad>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <be781982-f210-4336-9848-3ee26540da58@googlegroups.com>
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_MSNBC_Terror_Analyst_Insists=2C_NYC_Attack_=E2=80=98Not_?=
=?UTF-8?Q?Islam=2C=27_Could=27ve_Been_=27Radicalized_Catholics=27?=
From: VegasJerry <jerryst@cox.net>
Injection-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 20:55:03 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Print Article
Forward Article
On Friday, November 3, 2017 at 12:19:29 PM UTC-7, Dutch wrote:
> VegasJerry wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 2, 2017 at 4:40:26 PM UTC-7, Dutch wrote:
> >> VegasJerry wrote:
> >>>> My agenda is fuck Muslims that use violence to foist their backward
> >>>>> assed ideology on everyone else.
> >>> Like we didn't know that; duh!
> >>
> >> Do you disagree with that agenda?
> >
> > Embarrassing Seymore?
> >
> His agenda as stated above, do you disagree with it?

Knew you couldn't answer..