From: Dutch <>
Subject: Re: Please take this opportunity to remember
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id 69mr317225iok.117.1510097511368;
Tue, 07 Nov 2017 15:31:51 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Please take this opportunity to remember
References: <>
From: Dutch <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <GnrMB.2$5k6.0@fx25.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:31:50 UTC
Organization: UsenetServer -
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:31:20 -0800
X-Received-Bytes: 1668
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4086052367
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 1606
Print Article
Forward Article
fffurken wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 21:07:45 UTC, Dutch  wrote:
>> Will in New Haven wrote:
>>> He wasn't a conservative.
>> He wasn't a conservative, he was an atheist.
> Do you think there are no conservative atheists? Maybe I need to brush up on my American
definition of 'conservative' (I recall Vanek seeming to say that atheists and liberals were the same
>> How do you know so much about this guy?
> Maybe because he doesn't only read the MSM Fake News.

There's no such thing.

> I believe other evidence also suggests that he wasn't a conservative. So that unchecks two of the
most vilified categories (White (Y), Christian (N), Conservative (N)) of the rabid anti-Western left.

Quit making shit up.