Subject: Re: Please take this opportunity to remember
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 02:22:33 -0800 (PST), fffurken<firstname.lastname@example.org>
>On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 09:07:55 UTC, Bill Vanek wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 18:17:10 -0800 (PST), fffurken<email@example.com>
>> >On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:30:14 UTC, Bill Vanek wrote:
>> >> >Do you think there are no conservative atheists? Maybe I need to brush up on my American
definition of 'conservative' (I recall Vanek seeming to say that atheists and liberals were the same
>> >> Not really. Progressivism certainly worships government, and religion
>> >> and God are enemies of totalitarian rulers, so it's not terribly far
>> >> off to say that Progressives are all atheists.
>> >Vanek Dictionary
>> > a person who worships government
>> >> It's harder to
>> >> stereotype your run of the mill liberal. They're more likely to be
>> >> atheists, but the one thing they are with certainty is mentally ill.
>> >lol x 2
>> >"Atheism is a sign of mental illness" - Irony
>> Odd, but I've never noticed your inability to read until now.
>Why can't you just accept atheism for what it actually is?
>I'll try the wiki link -
>Atheism is, in the broadest sense, the absence of belief in the existence of deities.
Less broadly, atheism is the rejection of belief that any deities exist. In an even narrower
sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities. Atheism is
contrasted with theism, which, in its most general form, is the belief that at least one
Why can't you just reread what I wrote, and your reply, and then
explain to me what this post has to do with anything I wrote?