From: Travel <travel9599@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: News for Pop-Tard: Flynn Rolls on T-Rump
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.78.17 with SMTP id c17mr19943633qkb.41.1512680581754;
Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:03:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.41.81 with SMTP id p78mr1032412vkp.2.1512680581629; Thu,
07 Dec 2017 13:03:01 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!m31no784591qtf.0!news-out.google.com!t48ni1573qtc.1!nntp.google.com!g35no782094qtk.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 13:03:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <47ac5d3b-1f12-456c-9712-38cb69889914@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=96.230.12.185;
posting-account=IwVb7AoAAABv_Bz_BwnuI3y_DKKb0EgK
NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.230.12.185
References: <ovsmae$4bu$1@dont-email.me> <a55776f8-c8fe-4d86-a710-f777e9bae5b5@googlegroups.com>
<ba154b41-97b1-426c-8779-5ca45498056b@googlegroups.com> <eeb905ea-0487-4c34-a03c-6f48cd41d814@googlegroups.com>
<47ac5d3b-1f12-456c-9712-38cb69889914@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5590dfef-32fd-4db5-9cc1-c9f0e8f264cb@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: News for Pop-Tard: Flynn Rolls on T-Rump
From: Travel <travel9599@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 21:03:01 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2847
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1985649595
Print Article
Forward Article
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 8:22:27 AM UTC-5, VegasJerry wrote:
> On Saturday, December 2, 2017 at 4:54:26 PM UTC-8, Travel wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 2, 2017 at 4:05:57 PM UTC-5, fffurken wrote:
> > > On Saturday, 2 December 2017 14:36:53 UTC, Travel  wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Fizzle!
> > > 
> > > Quelle surprise.
> > > 
> > > And I pay almost absolutely no attention to this shit. I just know there's nothing in it.
>  
> > Right. If Mueller had anything but "lying to the FBI," he would have charged Flynn with it. 
> 
> Shows how stupid you are, because this is FOX’s position (and shows – one again – how they
fool you). Whereas this is a prosecutorial procedure used to garner cooperation from a witness. The
fact Mueller has NOT charge him YET, is how he’s got Flynn to flip.
> 
> > What kind of a witness does Flynn make for Mueller if Mueller himself is calling Flynn a liar? 
> 
> What kind of poster does this make you when you know so little about how this works?
> 
> JFC! Stop embarrassing yourself…
> 
> Jerry ‘n Vegas
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Mueller couldn't even charge Flynn with "conspiracy," which would be a desirable charge from
Mueller's point of view; because it's a wide-open, open-ended charge that can call into question
just about anyone.


Thanks for an idiot's eye view. We knew you were going to say something stupid.