From: Dutch <>
Subject: Re: Message for 'dutch'
Full headers:
Subject: Re: Message for dutch
References: <>
From: Dutch <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <RcT1C.20739$ET6.14512@fx38.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 21:05:53 UTC
Organization: UsenetServer -
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 13:05:52 -0800
X-Received-Bytes: 1827
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3058342097
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/29/2017 8:29 PM, risky biz wrote:
> On Friday, December 29, 2017 at 7:02:04 PM UTC-8, Dutch wrote:
>> On 12/29/2017 3:36 PM, risky biz wrote:
>>> “We as Jews know what happens when a religious group or ethnic group is targeted for hate,”
he said.
>> When we describe the creepy sexist and homophobic views of right wing
>> Christian fundamentalists are we targeting them for hate or just telling
>> the truth?  I wonder if you know the difference.
> You didn't 'describe the creepy sexist and homophobic views of right wing
> Muslim fundamentalists'. You told an obvious LIE about the membership of a Muslim mosque.
> Tell us, 'dutch'- did you investigate to find out if that was a liberal Muslim mosque or a
'right-wing' 'fundamentalist' mosque? Or did you just see a new lie about Muslims at a website
well-known for Islamophobic lies and immediately cut and paste it to RGP?
> Please answer.

You didn't answer my question.