From: fffurken <fffurken1@mail.com>
Subject: Re: Maybe Trump will help the resistence in Iran
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.92.130 with SMTP id q124mr14672764qkb.17.1514931227888;
Tue, 02 Jan 2018 14:13:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.149.200 with SMTP id x191mr3736318vkd.3.1514931227745;
Tue, 02 Jan 2018 14:13:47 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!m31no5754516qtf.0!news-out.google.com!t48ni2298qtc.1!nntp.google.com!m31no5754513qtf.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:13:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1xS2C.38907$pF5.31986@fx03.iad>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.46.28.99; posting-account=ooQ2cwkAAAD5fHesw79EWxuj2WdLyA1Z
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.46.28.99
References: <cc2c4da7-55fe-4623-94e7-acf691f76707@googlegroups.com>
<25f5a81b-75cd-4ec1-aa2d-092a50787084@googlegroups.com> <A1e2C.71666$oY6.36333@fx26.iad>
<532f6221-6a3f-4d60-87f2-c9b85069688c@googlegroups.com> <Trh2C.70369$qV5.49061@fx37.iad>
<3eba10f0-3b4c-474f-b86f-4cdc7af9495e@googlegroups.com> <434a9803-5902-4e76-a9dc-b5da6601c5e6@googlegroups.com>
<w2k2C.61466$_G5.56531@fx25.iad> <4c581f1f-6f53-4957-a403-1c1dd8f44d41@googlegroups.com>
<0900cb20-554b-490c-8f20-5af5666eb459@googlegroups.com> <1xS2C.38907$pF5.31986@fx03.iad>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d7b5492d-c316-42df-adb3-3898b9ef5fd7@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Maybe Trump will help the resistence in Iran
From: fffurken <fffurken1@mail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 22:13:47 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1682179356
X-Received-Bytes: 2778
Print Article
Forward Article
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 21:08:17 UTC, Dutch  wrote:
> On 1/2/2018 9:39 AM, risky biz wrote:
> >> A headscarf is formally required by law in Iran now and that's just as wrong as France banning
headscarves. Explain why you consider the former imposition by the state authoritarian while you
have absolutely no condemnation of the latter imposition of the state as authoritarian.
> 
> Context matters. The headscarf has become a symbol of the oppression of 
> females, attaching shame to the display of feminine beauty, something 
> anathema to French values and traditions. However I don't find banning 
> the headscarf to be a particularly good way to approach the issue. 
> Education would be better.

Good man

I don't think headscarves or burkas or any of that shite should be banned.. because the wearing of
hideous Islamic garb, particularly full face coverings, is a political statement, and a two fingered
salute to eh, "integration". And the broader public will eventually get that.