From: risky biz <>
Subject: Re: Maybe Trump will help the resistence in Iran
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id n29mr32809660qta.44.1514936278598;
Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:37:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id q129mr4539328vkf.0.1514936278458;
Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:37:58 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:37:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1xS2C.38907$pF5.31986@fx03.iad>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=; posting-account=6E1tdAoAAACWr5r8rFNJ0awN-fczz4Uf
References: <>
<> <A1e2C.71666$oY6.36333@fx26.iad>
<> <Trh2C.70369$qV5.49061@fx37.iad>
<> <>
<w2k2C.61466$_G5.56531@fx25.iad> <>
<> <1xS2C.38907$pF5.31986@fx03.iad>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Maybe Trump will help the resistence in Iran
From: risky biz <>
Injection-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 23:37:58 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 18
X-Received-Body-CRC: 444073582
X-Received-Bytes: 2775
Print Article
Forward Article
On Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 1:08:17 PM UTC-8, Dutch wrote:
> On 1/2/2018 9:39 AM, risky biz wrote:
> >> A headscarf is formally required by law in Iran now and that's just as wrong as France banning
headscarves. Explain why you consider the former imposition by the state authoritarian while you
have absolutely no condemnation of the latter imposition of the state as authoritarian.
> Context matters. The headscarf has become a symbol of the oppression of 
> females, attaching shame to the display of feminine beauty, something 
> anathema to French values and traditions. However I don't find banning 
> the headscarf to be a particularly good way to approach the issue. 
> Education would be better.

How someone else dresses is not YOUR 'issue', moron, if it isn't a flagrant affront to common

Extra points, though, for the extra effort expended to find a crack in the middle to slither into.