From: risky biz <swingtrader@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Maybe Trump will help the resistence in Iran
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.170.134 with SMTP id t128mr495559qke.21.1514971856934;
Wed, 03 Jan 2018 01:30:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.192.135 with SMTP id q129mr110069vkf.0.1514971856234;
Wed, 03 Jan 2018 01:30:56 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!g35no6011182qtk.1!news-out.google.com!t48ni2445qtc.1!nntp.google.com!g35no6011181qtk.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 01:30:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <LzZ2C.26239$fC.10463@fx43.iad>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.48.44.118; posting-account=6E1tdAoAAACWr5r8rFNJ0awN-fczz4Uf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.48.44.118
References: <cc2c4da7-55fe-4623-94e7-acf691f76707@googlegroups.com>
<25f5a81b-75cd-4ec1-aa2d-092a50787084@googlegroups.com> <A1e2C.71666$oY6.36333@fx26.iad>
<532f6221-6a3f-4d60-87f2-c9b85069688c@googlegroups.com> <Trh2C.70369$qV5.49061@fx37.iad>
<3eba10f0-3b4c-474f-b86f-4cdc7af9495e@googlegroups.com> <434a9803-5902-4e76-a9dc-b5da6601c5e6@googlegroups.com>
<w2k2C.61466$_G5.56531@fx25.iad> <4c581f1f-6f53-4957-a403-1c1dd8f44d41@googlegroups.com>
<0900cb20-554b-490c-8f20-5af5666eb459@googlegroups.com> <1xS2C.38907$pF5.31986@fx03.iad>
<8c721a38-a90e-47fa-b4ef-e58cef8b8c61@googlegroups.com> <eGX2C.45143$P14.43868@fx01.iad>
<p2hhd5$6f8$2@dont-email.me> <LzZ2C.26239$fC.10463@fx43.iad>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <a38da777-8a9e-4154-b378-e73d00dbb2c0@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Maybe Trump will help the resistence in Iran
From: risky biz <swingtrader@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 09:30:56 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 3410
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1484845482
Print Article
Forward Article
On Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 9:09:06 PM UTC-8, Dutch wrote:
> On 1/2/2018 7:07 PM, Clave wrote:
> > On 1/2/2018 6:59 PM, Dutch wrote:
> >> On 1/2/2018 3:37 PM, risky biz wrote:
> >>> How someone else dresses is not YOUR 'issue', moron, if it isn't a 
> >>> flagrant affront to common civility.
> >>
> >> How someone dresses is an indication of whether or not she in fact has 
> >> the freedom that a free society grants every citizen.
> > 
> > So you can just *tell* by what people are wearing what their motives for 
> > wearing those things are?
> 
> It's not rocket science, but I'll 'splain it for you anyway. In a 
> society where women have the same freedom as a man you see a wide 
> variety in styles of dress, because women are individual human beings 
> with individual tastes, ideas, motivations, etc.. Some like to dress 
> modestly, some like to dress flirtatiously or provocatively. It depends 
> on the person, the mood and the occasion. It defies reason that a 
> population of different people, all doing the same thing, are all doing 
> so by choice. 

That's exactly why either requiring a certain type of dress or banning a certain type of dress are
both equally despicable and why it reveals a despicable character to advocate one or the other.
Guess who I'm talking about.

You might say, so what if a whole group of people are 
> forced to wear scarves on their heads, but what if some days they don't 
> feel like it? And what about being forced to cover their faces? Facing 
> other people is one of the most fundamental and fulfilling parts of 
> human social interaction. It's a human right as basic as breathing air.