From: Tim Norfolk <>
Subject: Re: Childhood genius looks something like this....
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id j23mr1595713qtf.22.1515008896870;
Wed, 03 Jan 2018 11:48:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id x191mr264157vkx.2.1515008896426; Wed,
03 Jan 2018 11:48:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 11:48:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=;
References: <>
<> <>
<> <>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Childhood genius looks something like this....
From: Tim Norfolk <>
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 19:48:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1059251794
X-Received-Bytes: 2724
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wednesday, January 3, 2018 at 2:07:44 PM UTC-5, Tim Norfolk wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 7:44:58 PM UTC-5, fffurken wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 3 January 2018 00:31:34 UTC, Tim Norfolk  wrote:
> > 
> > > By the third generation, most of the effect disappears.
> > 
> > "Most".
> > 
> > Do you have a cite for that Tim? I'm not going to accept it just because you said it. Especially
because I think your motivation (to say it) would be to deny race realism and a hereditary link to
IQ, because that would be in line with your pro-black, anti-white (self-loathing) politics.
> I'll have to look for it. It was some time ago, and about the time that there were lawsuits
because of 'too many' Asians in the elite California universities.

Well, the papers that I can find suggest that the hereditary part of intelligence is 75-80%. Another
part is certainly due to nutrition. I just read a piece that showed the IQ of Indian-Americans
rising due to their increased meat intake.

I have always argued for genetics as a strong predictor of behaviour, including intelligence. My
teacher in Moral Philosophy in the 70's thought I was a Nazi.