From: Dutch <>
Subject: Re: Maybe Trump will help the resistence in Iran
Full headers:
Subject: Re: Maybe Trump will help the resistence in Iran
References: <>
<eGX2C.45143$P14.43868@fx01.iad> <p2hhd5$6f8$>
From: Dutch <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <KTb3C.35891$yr3.22195@fx13.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 21:26:02 UTC
Organization: UsenetServer -
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 13:26:01 -0800
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1194665130
X-Received-Bytes: 2192
Print Article
Forward Article
On 1/3/2018 1:30 AM, risky biz wrote:
> That's exactly why either requiring a certain type of dress or banning a certain type of dress are
both equally despicable

I'm glad you agree that requiring women to cover their faces is 
despicable. However your equivalency is flawed. Very few people would 
cover their face in public unless they were compelled, certainly not all 
the time. Of course banning anything is problematic when one is an 
advocate of personal freedom, but the context of a free society taking a 
stance against theocratic bullying has to be considered.