From: Dutch <>
Subject: Re: Julian Assange on The Memo
Full headers:
Subject: Re: Julian Assange on The Memo
References: <>
<p54g6a$kdg$> <>
From: Dutch <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <20qdC.3139$RQ3.1802@fx02.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 21:41:18 UTC
Organization: UsenetServer -
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 13:41:17 -0800
X-Received-Bytes: 2836
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2630304527
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/3/2018 8:51 AM, Bill Vanek wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 14:15:38 +0000 (UTC), (Bradley K.
> Sherman) wrote:
>> popinjay<> wrote:
>>> The memo reveals a clear violation of @realDonaldTrump and his campaign
>>> personnel’s Constitutional rights, as well as an attempt to use the
>>> intelligence community to alter a Presidential election. This is high
>>> treason and people need to be prosecuted.
>> Assange has been a Russian apparatchik for some time now.
>> Let's see what honest American conservatives are saying:
>> | ...
>> | In short, other than the memo confirming that Nunes and
>> | Trump are collectively out to discredit the intelligence
>> | community and to thereby impede the investigation into the
>> | president's alleged wrongdoing, I cannot for the life of me
>> | figure out what this proves. The media, if forthright, will
>> | explain that to Americans who must by this time be very,
>> | very confused as to why Nunes and Trump have rejected the
>> | advice of top officials who said release of the memo
>> | compromises classified information.
>> |
>> | This appears to be the second time (the first in the Oval
>> | Office with Russian officials) that Trump has handed the
>> | Russians classified material. If Trump is not a Russian
>> | agent, he surely is acting as effectively as one.
>> |
> I see you've become just another dishonest piece of shit, then. "Let's
> see what honest American conservatives are saying", huh? How about
> "let's see what one claimed conservative is saying? Would that be a
> bit more accurate? There might even be others, but I believe they are
> badly outnumbered by people who understand the seriousness of this
> matter.

What matter? That the FBI discovered that the Trump campaign was 
involved with Russian spies?