Subject: Re: Julian Assange on The Memo
On 2/3/2018 8:51 AM, Bill Vanek wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 14:15:38 +0000 (UTC), email@example.com (Bradley K.
> Sherman) wrote:
>> popinjay<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> The memo reveals a clear violation of @realDonaldTrump and his campaign
>>> personnelâ€™s Constitutional rights, as well as an attempt to use the
>>> intelligence community to alter a Presidential election. This is high
>>> treason and people need to be prosecuted.
>> Assange has been a Russian apparatchik for some time now.
>> Let's see what honest American conservatives are saying:
>> | ...
>> | In short, other than the memo confirming that Nunes and
>> | Trump are collectively out to discredit the intelligence
>> | community and to thereby impede the investigation into the
>> | president's alleged wrongdoing, I cannot for the life of me
>> | figure out what this proves. The media, if forthright, will
>> | explain that to Americans who must by this time be very,
>> | very confused as to why Nunes and Trump have rejected the
>> | advice of top officials who said release of the memo
>> | compromises classified information.
>> | This appears to be the second time (the first in the Oval
>> | Office with Russian officials) that Trump has handed the
>> | Russians classified material. If Trump is not a Russian
>> | agent, he surely is acting as effectively as one.
> I see you've become just another dishonest piece of shit, then. "Let's
> see what honest American conservatives are saying", huh? How about
> "let's see what one claimed conservative is saying? Would that be a
> bit more accurate? There might even be others, but I believe they are
> badly outnumbered by people who understand the seriousness of this
What matter? That the FBI discovered that the Trump campaign was
involved with Russian spies?