Subject: Re: Where Are All Our Wingnuts?
On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 19:41:35 -0800, Dutch<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>On 2/3/2018 5:55 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 17:11:10 -0800, Dutch<email@example.com> wrote:
>>> On 2/3/2018 4:41 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 14:22:50 -0800, Dutch<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>>> It's not relevant where information supporting a FISA warrant comes from
>>>>> or if the source has a bias. All that matters to the court is that the
>>>>> information is shown to be credible and supports probable cause. The
>>>>> memo is a complete dud. BUT, Nunes, Trump and company don't really care
>>>>> about being factual (he never has). They know that all they need to do
>>>>> is make a bunch of noise, issue some wild accusations, and their
>>>>> supporters will array behind them.
>>>>> I fear that the real agenda is to justify a purge of the FBI and Justice
>>>>> Dept, because the noose is tightening and Orange Clown Man will not go
>>>>> down without a fight. I see no way to avoid this, unless, and this is a
>>>>> possibility, Trump is actually delusional enough to believe that he has
>>>>> done nothing wrong
>>>> Tell you what, why don't you tell us precisely what Trump has done
>>>> wrong regarding Russia and the election? Or tell us what CNN told you.
>>>> Tell us all what indictable crimes *he* has committed.
>>> Collusion with Russian operatives to release illegally obtained
>>> information against his political opponents followed by a daily stream
>>> of actions, lies and naive admissions of guilt surrounding his attempts
>>> to obstruct the investigation into those crimes.
>> What then is collusion with Russian operatives and corrupted FBI
>> figures to release false info about Trump during an election? And is
>> collusion a crime? You could check with your lawyer buddy.
>You're a hopeless dupe.
That is straight out of BillB's playbook. "No, *you* are!"
>>>>> and lets the investigation play out.
>>>>> The difference between this and Watergate is that at that time the
>>>>> Congress was actually an independent branch of government, and the
>>>>> Republican Party still believed in the Constitution. That's gone now. In
>>>>> 2018 the American Congress serves at the whim of the president.
>>>>> There are fireworks coming the likes of which any your country has never
>>>>> seen. It is sad to see, and at the same time very entertaining to watch.
>>>> All reasonable Americans are praying for those fireworks, as long as
>>>> they are non-partisan fireworks.
>>> There is no American more non-partisan than Mueller
>> There is no word more apt for you than "naive".
> From all reports he is a highly respected Republican straight arrow.
>That is, until he started getting close to Trump..
*All* reports then. Okay.
>I recall you having a shred of a conscience at one point. What happened
>to you? Whatever it is, it is apparently the same disease that the
>Congressional Republicans have contracted.
Sheesh. Did I do something wrong, too?
>>> . But the fireworks I
>>> do not believe will come from him because Trump is going to get rid of
>>> him. Like a cornered rat he is going to lash out, he doesn't have much
>> Mueller should be fired. There is not a non-partisan human left in
>> this country, and Mueller is far from it. Trump is not cornered. There
>> is nothing on him, except in the fevered imagination of CNN.
>You are delusional. At least Trump appears to have the awareness to
>realize the situation he is in. That is exactly why this laughable
>diversion was thrown up. He has manufactured cover for any future
>obstructions of this process. And they are sure to continue.
I sure hope so. I want all out war. I don't care who goes down, as
long as it's all the corrupt folks. Of course, that means another
government shutdown, but for a brand new reason.
>>> You don't seem to understand that. We
>>>> do need a purge, and another thing you don't understand is that Trump
>>>> could represent that purge. Why do you think so many politicians from
>>>> *both* parties hate him?
>>> If there were actually enough patriots in the US Congress willing to
>>> admit what is happening Trump would already be facing impeachment.
>> Would Hillary be facing indictment? Lois Lerner? Any Dems at all?
>What an idiot. Private citizen Hillary Clinton and whatever legal
>problems she may face should be absolutely of no interest to anyone.
Because she's a liberal? And once someone leaves government, anything
they did in government should be forgotten? Interesting.
> It certainly has nothing to do with the collusion by the Trump Crime Family
>that is sitting in plain sight of anyone who cares to see it.
>And yes, I am aware that "collusion" per se, in and of itself is not a
Then why do you go on about it? You keep using the word, even though I
asked you to name some actual crimes.