Subject: Re: Julian Assange on The Memo
On 2/3/2018 10:00 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 21:35:32 -0800, Dutch<email@example.com> wrote:
>> On 2/3/2018 8:26 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>>> On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 04:18:51 +0000 (UTC), firstname.lastname@example.org (Bradley K.
>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>> Bill Vanek<email@example.com> wrote:
>>>>> What is it when the FBI & Fusion fight or ignore subpoenas? What's
>>>>> your name for that? By your reasoning, they must be very guilty of
>>>>> very bad things.
>>>> My name for it is bullshit.
>>> Funny, that's my name for the Trump investigation. Strange how that
>> And like the congress and Trump, you can't PROVE it's bullshit, you just
>> repeat it over and over and over...
> Prove anything. Seriously. I will be honest, I don't do my own
> research, I don't do my own detective work. I read, that's all. I'm
> going to assume that it's the same for you, except you don't read, you
> just watch. I have many varied sources, you have one. Your opinions
> are not at all surprising considering that. You don't weigh the
> plausibility of varied sources because you don't have varied sources.
> That's pretty limiting, and shows a lack of intellectual curiosity.
> After a lifetime of that, you just end up stupid.
I weight plausibility a lot, and the Trumpster/Fox version of reality
has none. And I haven't seen any evidence of this alleged objective
point of view you claim to have cultivated.