From: Dutch <>
Subject: Re: Julian Assange on The Memo
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id n72mr12399251qkl.30.1517728879595;
Sat, 03 Feb 2018 23:21:19 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Julian Assange on The Memo
References: <>
<> <h5vdC.14275$KA7.9169@fx05.iad>
<> <p561jb$agm$>
<> <EYwdC.2068$9W2.709@fx31.iad>
From: Dutch <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <PvydC.2530$EV2.2231@fx30.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 07:21:19 UTC
Organization: UsenetServer -
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 23:21:19 -0800
X-Received-Bytes: 2520
X-Received-Body-CRC: 982719983
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 2458
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/3/2018 10:00 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 21:35:32 -0800, Dutch<> wrote:
>> On 2/3/2018 8:26 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>>> On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 04:18:51 +0000 (UTC), (Bradley K.
>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>> Bill Vanek<> wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>> What is it when the FBI & Fusion fight or ignore subpoenas? What's
>>>>> your name for that? By your reasoning, they must be very guilty of
>>>>> very bad things.
>>>> My name for it is bullshit.
>>> Funny, that's my name for the Trump investigation. Strange how that
>>> works.
>> And like the congress and Trump, you can't PROVE it's bullshit, you just
>> repeat it over and over and over...
> Prove anything. Seriously. I will be honest, I don't do my own
> research, I don't do my own detective work. I read, that's all. I'm
> going to assume that it's the same for you, except you don't read, you
> just watch. I have many varied sources, you have one. Your opinions
> are not at all surprising considering that. You don't weigh the
> plausibility of varied sources because you don't have varied sources.
> That's pretty limiting, and shows a lack of intellectual curiosity.
> After a lifetime of that, you just end up stupid.
I weight plausibility a lot, and the Trumpster/Fox version of reality 
has none. And I haven't seen any evidence of this alleged objective 
point of view you claim to have cultivated.