Subject: Re: Where Are All Our Wingnuts?
On 2/3/2018 11:53 PM, Clave wrote:
> On 2/3/2018 11:32 PM, Dutch wrote:
>> On 2/3/2018 10:00 PM, Clave wrote:
>>> On 2/3/2018 9:19 PM, Dutch wrote:
>>>> On 2/3/2018 7:50 PM, Clave wrote:
>>>>>> And yes, I am aware that "collusion" per se, in and of itself is
>>>>>> not a crime.
>>>>> The obstruction *IS* the collusion.
>>>> I don't follow. The Trump campaign colluded with Russia, i.e.
>>>> *illegally* exchanged promises to drop sanctions in exchange for the
>>>> release of *illegally obtained* damaging information about Clinton,
>>>> then subsequently the Trumpsters have, in a variety of ways, worked
>>>> to *illegally* obstruct the investigation into it. There appears to
>>>> me to be separate and independent sets of crimes.
>>> There is no such crime as "collusion."
>> I know, I didn't call it a crime.
> What does "illegally" mean to you then?
The illegality is not simply colluding with a foreign power, but how
they did it. They promised to lift sanctions before Trump was president
and accepted help in the form of illegally obtained information.
>>> There currently exists no (public) proof of the quid pro quo you
>>> allege regarding sanctions. Correlation is not proof of causation,
>>> although there are hot bullet shells all over the floor.
>> afaik Flynn admitted it. It also appears that he is admitting that he
>> cleared it with the Whitehouse.
> "AFAIK" is not proof in any legal sense, and there are no such public
> admissions. Yet.
That Fox report appears to suggest that Flynn has already copped to
promising sanction relief with the approval of the Whitehouse.