Subject: Re: Julian Assange on The Memo
On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 10:00:31 PM UTC-8, Bill Vanek wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 21:35:32 -0800, Dutch<email@example.com> wrote:
> >On 2/3/2018 8:26 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
> >> On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 04:18:51 +0000 (UTC), firstname.lastname@example.org (Bradley K.
> >> Sherman) wrote:
> >>> Bill Vanek<email@example.com> wrote:
> >>>> ...
> >>>> What is it when the FBI & Fusion fight or ignore subpoenas? What's
> >>>> your name for that? By your reasoning, they must be very guilty of
> >>>> very bad things.
> >>> My name for it is bullshit.
> >> Funny, that's my name for the Trump investigation. Strange how that
> >> works.
> >And like the congress and Trump, you can't PROVE it's bullshit, you just
> >repeat it over and over and over...
> Prove anything. Seriously.
You’ve been asked to ‘prove’ your accusations a number of times. You charge the FBI as being
crooked, yet when asked for anything on that, you simply disappear. Like “I won’t answer, that
way I’m in the clear.” You know, like Trump keeps doing.
> I will be honest, I don't do my own research, I don't do my own detective work.
You drink the FOX/GOP cool aid, puke it up here, then run from the fact you were fooled.
Show us the lists!
> I read, that's all. I'm going to assume that it's the same for you, except you don't read…
Heh, “Here, let me make up some positions for you, then I’ll argue those made up positions.”
> I have many varied sources, you have one.
> Your opinions are not at all surprising considering that.
See? You’re arguing the position you just made up for him? Stupid much?
You’re a fool and a stooge – and you’ve proved it yourself…
Jerry (LOLing at this idiot) ‘n Vegas