From: fffurken <>
Subject: Re: Football, big fucking deal
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id v136mr141277qka.48.1517864750754;
Mon, 05 Feb 2018 13:05:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id v5mr16099vkd.5.1517864750627; Mon, 05
Feb 2018 13:05:50 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 13:05:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=; posting-account=ooQ2cwkAAAD5fHesw79EWxuj2WdLyA1Z
References: <>
<TaSdC.21602$d03.15480@fx37.iad> <>
<> <>
<> <>
<> <>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Football, big fucking deal
From: fffurken <>
Injection-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 21:05:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 32
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, 5 February 2018 21:00:15 UTC, BillB  wrote:
> On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 12:41:07 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
> > What's "racist" about the truth? By what objective measure is what I said wrong? Of course, I'm
talking to someone who has a profound racism phobia, so objectivity >is pretty much out the window.
> rac·ism 
> ˈrāˌsizəm/
> "the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that
race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races."
> Your attitudes meet the EXACT definition of racism. You ARE a racist. Take it up with Oxford, not
> Wikipedia is even more succinct:
> "Racism is the belief in the superiority of one race over another"
> Isn't that what you just expressed?
> "there is a broad scientific agreement that essentialist and typological conceptualizations of
race are untenable"  ...except on youtube  LOL

lol Don't you ever tired of dictionary definitions (in place of an argument)?

Fine, I'm a "racist". Now can you tell me by what objective measure what I said is false?