From: risky biz <>
Subject: Re: Where Are All Our Wingnuts?
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id b78mr507811qkc.62.1517877550257;
Mon, 05 Feb 2018 16:39:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id x83mr71036vkx.0.1517877550165; Mon, 05
Feb 2018 16:39:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 16:39:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=; posting-account=6E1tdAoAAACWr5r8rFNJ0awN-fczz4Uf
References: <p537da$dsm$> <>
<> <%CqdC.11559$Cy2.3695@fx44.iad>
<> <P4tdC.4651$qc.1298@fx04.iad> <>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Where Are All Our Wingnuts?
From: risky biz <>
Injection-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:39:10 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 70
Print Article
Forward Article
On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 5:55:40 PM UTC-8, Bill Vanek wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 17:11:10 -0800, Dutch<> wrote:
> >On 2/3/2018 4:41 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
> >> On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 14:22:50 -0800, Dutch<> wrote:
> >> 
> >>>
> >>> It's not relevant where information supporting a FISA warrant comes from
> >>> or if the source has a bias. All that matters to the court is that the
> >>> information is shown to be credible and supports probable cause. The
> >>> memo is a complete dud. BUT, Nunes, Trump and company don't really care
> >>> about being factual (he never has). They know that all they need to do
> >>> is make a bunch of noise, issue some wild accusations, and their
> >>> supporters will array behind them.
> >>>
> >>> I fear that the real agenda is to justify a purge of the FBI and Justice
> >>> Dept, because the noose is tightening and Orange Clown Man will not go
> >>> down without a fight. I see no way to avoid this, unless, and this is a
> >>> possibility, Trump is actually delusional enough to believe that he has
> >>> done nothing wrong
> >> 
> >> Tell you what, why don't you tell us precisely what Trump has done
> >> wrong regarding Russia and the election? Or tell us what CNN told you.
> >> Tell us all what indictable crimes *he* has committed.
> >
> >Collusion with Russian operatives to release illegally obtained 
> >information against his political opponents followed by a daily stream 
> >of actions, lies and naive admissions of guilt surrounding his attempts 
> >to obstruct the investigation into those crimes.
> What then is collusion with Russian operatives and corrupted FBI
> figures to release false info about Trump during an election? And is
> collusion a crime? You could check with your lawyer buddy. 

'Fantasy', to not put too fine a point on it.

> >>> and lets the investigation play out.
> >>>
> >>> The difference between this and Watergate is that at that time the
> >>> Congress was actually an independent branch of government, and the
> >>> Republican Party still believed in the Constitution. That's gone now. In
> >>> 2018 the American Congress serves at the whim of the president.
> >>>
> >>> There are fireworks coming the likes of which any your country has never
> >>> seen. It is sad to see, and at the same time very entertaining to watch.
> >> 
> >> All reasonable Americans are praying for those fireworks, as long as
> >> they are non-partisan fireworks.
> >
> >There is no American more non-partisan than Mueller
> There is no word more apt for you than "naive". 
> >. But the fireworks I 
> >do not believe will come from him because Trump is going to get rid of 
> >him. Like a cornered rat he is going to lash out, he doesn't have much 
> >choice.
> Mueller should be fired. There is not a non-partisan human left in
> this country, and Mueller is far from it. Trump is not cornered. There
> is nothing on him, except in the fevered imagination of CNN. 
> >  You don't seem to understand that. We
> >> do need a purge, and another thing you don't understand is that Trump
> >> could represent that purge. Why do you think so many politicians from
> >> *both* parties hate him?
> >
> >If there were actually enough patriots in the US Congress willing to 
> >admit what is happening Trump would already be facing impeachment.
> Would Hillary be facing indictment? Lois Lerner? Any Dems at all?