Subject: Re: Breaking News!! BillB on Stocks!!!
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id r28mr703538qtc.7.1517886668558;
Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:11:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id y200mr102717vky.3.1517886668449; Mon,
05 Feb 2018 19:11:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 19:11:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=; posting-account=GLrzsQoAAABV9VjkDOhhJnHW1VBR8ISD
References: <> <>
<> <>
<> <>
<> <>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Breaking News!! BillB on Stocks!!!
From: BillB <>
Injection-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 03:11:08 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 17
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 6:57:50 PM UTC-8, Bill Vanek wrote:

> >I'm not sure what you are suggesting here. Are you saying good traders and portfolio managers
should retire long before 55? 
> No, Cathy. What I'm saying is that anyone "hoping to retire" by then
> should be able to. Honestly, you should be able to make lots of money
> at will, so what's the holdup?

I didn't say I was "hoping to retire". I've never said that in my life. That's just not something I
would ever say.

I think I might have said I am retiring at 55 (i.e. now) with more money than I will ever spend (we
have very simple tastes), but I actually meant "semi-semi-retiring". As I have made clear many times
in the past, I never intend to fully retire, unless I simply can't continue for health reasons.
There's too many people who depend on me and my gigantic brain.