Subject: Re: This is why Dutch hates Canada
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.73.206 with SMTP id w197mr128178qka.37.1518115486653;
Thu, 08 Feb 2018 10:44:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.180.205 with SMTP id d196mr7821vkf.10.1518115486515; Thu,
08 Feb 2018 10:44:46 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!q21no129377qtn.1!news-out.google.com!h12ni467qte.0!nntp.google.com!q21no129374qtn.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:44:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e37da7f6-67d5-4f14-ad7e-c65426222379@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=45.44.67.74; posting-account=GLrzsQoAAABV9VjkDOhhJnHW1VBR8ISD
NNTP-Posting-Host: 45.44.67.74
References: <d88810db-8693-466a-a345-a76175767937@googlegroups.com>
<0fseC.1820$zS1.1477@fx20.iad> <8bb8a0cd-70a7-42e4-a60c-2a45ecaf5dee@googlegroups.com>
<QOteC.1823$zS1.1532@fx20.iad> <78c65a51-82d1-44a9-b472-dfcffc51bfc8@googlegroups.com>
<zVyeC.9921$9%2.4260@fx36.iad> <edc6232b-4863-4312-afef-4380287c9938@googlegroups.com>
<1FzeC.35150$m03.2270@fx38.iad> <04624d26-6a7d-47bc-b23a-6821d666dc55@googlegroups.com>
<A3JeC.23335$Cy2.16753@fx44.iad> <p5fmjv$m6p$1@dont-email.me>
<GHJeC.16051$RQ3.11322@fx02.iad> <a77cb342-b809-42f5-9dee-08e8a1af77c7@googlegroups.com>
<5119a0f2-d427-4289-825e-465e2fdeeab8@googlegroups.com> <83359a3c-2b77-4d2e-ad5c-bd814b595279@googlegroups.com>
<2c5f451a-9506-4b5b-9000-75096a4ddbdc@googlegroups.com> <33e8e9c7-69ea-42aa-8515-df620b563c7a@googlegroups.com>
<57475d38-72bf-4d49-bed0-c0beec202654@googlegroups.com> <a8601c59-b0fc-4ed5-94a9-92184a9c8e29@googlegroups.com>
<e37da7f6-67d5-4f14-ad7e-c65426222379@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <a17445f4-c4e8-4e03-821f-51b54dd8e29c@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: This is why Dutch hates Canada
From: BillB <williambradleyllb@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:44:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 50
Print Article
Forward Article
On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 10:30:27 AM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 February 2018 18:27:47 UTC, BillB  wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 10:24:50 AM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 8 February 2018 18:17:44 UTC, BillB  wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 10:11:49 AM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, 8 February 2018 17:31:37 UTC, BillB  wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 8:01:49 AM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thursday, 8 February 2018 07:30:09 UTC, BillB  wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > What do the Muslims have to do to "integrate" to King Dutch's satisfaction?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > It's a moot question because it will never happen. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Of course it won't. King Dutch is an Islamophobe.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Everyone knows you can't read (for comprehension)
> > > > 
> > > > By that you mean you didn't understand my question??  lol
> > > 
> > > If that's the case, how did I know that it was moot?
> > 
> > I asked:
> > 
> > "What do the Muslims have to do to "integrate" to King Dutch's satisfaction?" 
> > 
> > Your answer was that it is moot because it will never happen.
> > 
> > I agreed.
> > 
> > English, motherfucker. Do you speak it?
> 
> moot
> adjective
> 
> having little or no practical relevance.
> "the whole matter is becoming increasingly moot"

We all know what moot is. The question was ""What do the Muslims have to do to "integrate" to King
Dutch's satisfaction?" 

Your answer was that it is moot because it will never happen.

I agreed. The question is moot because Dutch will never be satisfied no matter what Muslims do. he's
an Islamophobe. We already established that them minding their own business and obeying the law
isn't good enough for him, but he won't give me any specifics beyond that. Sort of like how you use
the term "mass immigration" yet cannot define it with any specificity.