Subject: Re: ATTN: Paul & C - - 1 deal, 2 royals
On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 4:08:25 AM UTC-8, drwhod...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, March 2, 2018 at 5:44:54 PM UTC-6, risky biz wrote:
> > On Friday, March 2, 2018 at 1:42:23 PM UTC-8, drwhod...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Friday, March 2, 2018 at 2:17:57 PM UTC-6, drwhod...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Friday, March 2, 2018 at 9:44:50 AM UTC-6, risky biz wrote:
> > > > > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/h6x9na7de7np2s1/AAA_-SSiibrT7wEkw5gbRpe2a...
> > > >
> > > > Yours, I hope? It has never happened to me on 10 play or less... at least not for
memorable stakes. Nickels and dimes. I have seen it, though. Last time, was fitty cent STP on an
8X multiplier. Very nice pay day.
> > > >
> > > > C
> > >
> > > Check that. 3 RFs on a 4 RF hold at 10 play last year. Dimes, getting me just enough for a
W2. I was running through a butt load of free play from a loss rebate promotion. It didn't make me
rich, but it was remarkable.
> > >
> > > C
> > Wow. Three. Just hitting three in 10 hands is remarkable.
> Congratulations. I have often hit fewer than two or three in fifty and hundred play. Too often.
I saw a guy in a high limit room playing a 50-play and hitting a hand pay repeatedly. A staffer was
delegated to stay right near him to finish the paperwork faster. I didn't go closer to see how high
he was playing because he seemed antsy about other players being near him but I couldn't help
thinking that it makes a lot more sense to lower the bet so that a certain higher hand or lower,
full house and lower, for example, come in under the reporting cutoff.