From: risky biz <swingtrader@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ATTN: Paul & C - - 1 deal, 2 royals
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.237.59.91 with SMTP id q27mr6668673qte.11.1520090600241;
Sat, 03 Mar 2018 07:23:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.178.81 with SMTP id b78mr964642vkf.14.1520090600078; Sat,
03 Mar 2018 07:23:20 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!r16no2841850qtn.1!news-out.google.com!a13ni398qtd.1!nntp.google.com!t24no2864703qtn.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 07:23:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5c1a929c-c2d8-4a32-a90e-b05632b2921a@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.48.44.118; posting-account=6E1tdAoAAACWr5r8rFNJ0awN-fczz4Uf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.48.44.118
References: <beb2784b-8e42-4eb1-bd82-8f1d57fa4a0f@googlegroups.com>
<17472971-a97b-42e8-b789-1742b31f93b8@googlegroups.com> <e8a512df-45ea-416a-b604-743bdf2dc381@googlegroups.com>
<68b63f77-0613-43c8-8d9d-e6e3c9e0fdb4@googlegroups.com> <5c1a929c-c2d8-4a32-a90e-b05632b2921a@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <7322af76-f263-461a-a49f-d063d121967a@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: ATTN: Paul & C - - 1 deal, 2 royals
From: risky biz <swingtrader@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2018 15:23:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2536594057
X-Received-Bytes: 3244
Print Article
Forward Article
On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 4:08:25 AM UTC-8, drwhod...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, March 2, 2018 at 5:44:54 PM UTC-6, risky biz wrote:
> > On Friday, March 2, 2018 at 1:42:23 PM UTC-8, drwhod...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Friday, March 2, 2018 at 2:17:57 PM UTC-6, drwhod...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Friday, March 2, 2018 at 9:44:50 AM UTC-6, risky biz wrote:
> > > > > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/h6x9na7de7np2s1/AAA_-SSiibrT7wEkw5gbRpe2a...
> > > > 
> > > > Yours, I hope?  It has never happened to me on 10 play or less...  at least not for
memorable stakes.  Nickels and dimes. I have seen it, though.  Last time, was fitty cent STP on an
8X multiplier.  Very nice pay day.
> > > > 
> > > > C
> > > 
> > > Check that.  3 RFs on a 4 RF hold at 10 play last year.  Dimes, getting me just enough for a
W2.  I was running through a butt load of free play from a loss rebate promotion.  It didn't make me
rich, but it was remarkable.
> > > 
> > > C
> > 
> > Wow. Three. Just hitting three in 10 hands is remarkable.
> 
> Congratulations.  I have often hit fewer than two or three in fifty and hundred play.  Too often.
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/86170360@N07/27374393926/
> 
> C

I saw a guy in a high limit room playing a 50-play and hitting a hand pay repeatedly. A staffer was
delegated to stay right near him to finish the paperwork faster. I didn't go closer to see how high
he was playing because he seemed antsy about other players being near him but I couldn't help
thinking that it makes a lot more sense to lower the bet so that a certain higher hand or lower,
full house and lower, for example, come in under the reporting cutoff.