From: popinjay <>
Subject: Re: ATTN: Paul & C - - 1 deal, 2 royals
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id t38mr6725666qtb.22.1520097805616;
Sat, 03 Mar 2018 09:23:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id w2mr998260vke.10.1520097805301; Sat,
03 Mar 2018 09:23:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 09:23:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=2001:558:6012:3:a983:ca60:5661:3346;
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:558:6012:3:a983:ca60:5661:3346
References: <>
<> <>
<> <>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: ATTN: Paul & C - - 1 deal, 2 royals
From: popinjay <>
Injection-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2018 17:23:25 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 16
Print Article
Forward Article
On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 7:23:32 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

> I saw a guy in a high limit room playing a 50-play and hitting a hand pay repeatedly. A staffer
was delegated to stay right near him to finish the paperwork faster. I didn't go closer to see how
high he was playing because he seemed antsy about other players being near him but I couldn't help
thinking that it makes a lot more sense to lower the bet so that a certain higher hand or lower,
full house and lower, for example, come in under the reporting cutoff.

That was probably Bob Dancer.