From: VegasJerry <jerryst@cox.net>
Subject: Re: A weak 'President'
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.9.130 with SMTP id 124mr7361444qkj.55.1520127286832;
Sat, 03 Mar 2018 17:34:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.160.212 with SMTP id j203mr1022441vke.12.1520127286687;
Sat, 03 Mar 2018 17:34:46 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!r16no3094634qtn.1!news-out.google.com!a13ni451qtd.1!nntp.google.com!t24no3118119qtn.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 17:34:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <04qdnb4Xr8GX3wbHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.104.8.178; posting-account=Hm3-XAoAAADEywKbjLyIgNX200WVCCV9
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.104.8.178
References: <17e861cc-43f2-43cc-9af2-a7e8a2e49633@googlegroups.com>
<cMidnVkAq43wXAfHnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <%LDmC.112133$u94.45826@fx08.iad>
<ILydnY3MIoc_kAbHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com> <BAFmC.64372$RQ3.25830@fx02.iad>
<04qdnb4Xr8GX3wbHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3dceca00-76d4-490c-ac91-7b5174ce4c61@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: A weak President
From: VegasJerry <jerryst@cox.net>
Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 01:34:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 126
Print Article
Forward Article
On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 4:47:13 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> On 3/3/2018 4:45 PM, Dutch wrote:
> > On 3/3/2018 1:03 PM, da pickle wrote:
> >> On 3/3/2018 2:41 PM, Dutch wrote:
> >>> On 3/3/2018 7:38 AM, da pickle wrote:
> >>>> On 3/3/2018 9:15 AM, risky biz wrote:
> >>>>> Says it all.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 'Brennan was asked by Nicolle Wallace on MSNBC if he thought Trump 
> >>>>> was “too unstable” to possess the nuclear codes that would allow 
> >>>>> him to launch an attack. Brennan responded that he was rattled by 
> >>>>> the president’s strange focus on Baldwin the morning after Russian 
> >>>>> President Vladimir Putin boasted of his nation’s nuclear 
> >>>>> capabilities to strike anywhere in the world, including the U.S. A 
> >>>>> simulated video presented by Putin appeared to depict 
> >>>>> next-generation nuclear missiles striking Florida.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Trump has yet to respond to Putin. Instead, he ranted against the 
> >>>>> actor in an error-riddled tweet early Friday morning (the tweet was 
> >>>>> later reposted with corrections).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> “When I hear what Vladimir Putin was saying about the nuclear 
> >>>>> capabilities he has [and] then the president of the United States 
> >>>>> is tweeting about Alec Baldwin this morning, I mean, where is your 
> >>>>> sense of priorities?” Brennan asked. “I think a lot of Americans 
> >>>>> are looking at what’s happening with a sense of: This is surreal.”
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There’s “deep, deep worry and concern for this country’s national 
> >>>>> security,” he added.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> “Our country needs strong leadership now. If we have somebody in 
> >>>>> the Oval Office who is unstable, inept, inexperienced and also 
> >>>>> unethical, we really have rough waters ahead,” he said.
> >>>>>
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/cia-john-brennan-security-conce... 
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I raise your huffingtonpost with american spectator.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://spectator.org/confirmed-john-brennan-colluded-with-foreign-s... 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Will your country ever emerge from this "alternative facts" nightmare?
> >>>
> >>> Note: as you did with my comment about Trump's startling remarks 
> >>> about due process, you conveniently ignored this pointed criticism of 
> >>> Trump's choice to tweet at "Alex Baldwin" just as Putin utters thinly 
> >>> veiled nuclear threats against America.
> >>
> >> You pick a news source that is biased one way and I will raise you one 
> >> that is biased another way.  The only difference is that I recognize 
> >> the bias of both and you believe your choice is the only *truth* 
> >> available.
> >>
> >> Bias works both ways ... learn to listen to all and choose wisely.
> >>
> >> Sometimes you choose wisely and other times ... you go all BillB on us 
> >> and drop off the grid.
> >>
> >> [Do you know who Brennan is, Dutch?]
> > 
> > Off you go again with the grandstanding and whataboutery dodges.
> > 
> > Trump's remarks about suspending due process were not the result of 
> > "biased reporting", nor were the rest of his flip-flops on the gun 
> > issue, immigration, and just about every other issue.
> > 
> > Trump's choice to tweet nonsense at Alec Baldwin combined with deafening 
> > silence on Putin's anti-American sabre rattling was not the result of 
> > "biased reporting".
> > 
> > Trump's sudden announcement that he has decided to start a trade war 
> > with the rest of the world is not the result of "biased reporting".
> > 
> > Jared's Whitehouse meetings and subsequent suspiciously massive loans 
> > were not the result of "biased reporting".
> > 
> > Jared's 50 and counting corrections to his security clearance form are 
> > not the result of "biased reporting".
> > 
> > Ivanka's involvement with the Vancouver Trump tower which is being 
> > investigated by the FBI for conflicts of interest and probably money 
> > laundering is not the result of "biased reporting".
> > 
> > The mass exodus of staff from the Whitehouse is not the result of 
> > "biased reporting".
> > 
> > And that was just last week. Wake up from your trance pickle, this is real.
> 
> You complain when risky just changes the subject ... then you do it 
> yourself ... very much like Jerry.

Then you should have no trouble showing us, which you can't, any more than you can show those
lists...

Get a dog and quit pestering us.