From: risky biz <swingtrader@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ATTN: Paul & C - - 1 deal, 2 royals
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.24.153 with SMTP id 25mr7276798qky.6.1520139817256;
Sat, 03 Mar 2018 21:03:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.147.5 with SMTP id v5mr1168627vkd.5.1520139817120; Sat,
03 Mar 2018 21:03:37 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!r16no3156672qtn.1!news-out.google.com!a13ni467qtd.1!nntp.google.com!t24no3180174qtn.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 21:03:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <23937011-5cf1-45d6-a61c-1b318e2773fc@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.48.44.118; posting-account=6E1tdAoAAACWr5r8rFNJ0awN-fczz4Uf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.48.44.118
References: <beb2784b-8e42-4eb1-bd82-8f1d57fa4a0f@googlegroups.com>
<17472971-a97b-42e8-b789-1742b31f93b8@googlegroups.com> <e8a512df-45ea-416a-b604-743bdf2dc381@googlegroups.com>
<68b63f77-0613-43c8-8d9d-e6e3c9e0fdb4@googlegroups.com> <5c1a929c-c2d8-4a32-a90e-b05632b2921a@googlegroups.com>
<7322af76-f263-461a-a49f-d063d121967a@googlegroups.com> <23937011-5cf1-45d6-a61c-1b318e2773fc@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ca20d03d-16f7-445f-9e74-1c7787b50210@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: ATTN: Paul & C - - 1 deal, 2 royals
From: risky biz <swingtrader@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 05:03:37 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 23
Print Article
Forward Article
On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 9:23:38 AM UTC-8, popinjay wrote:
> On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 7:23:32 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > I saw a guy in a high limit room playing a 50-play and hitting a hand pay repeatedly. A staffer
was delegated to stay right near him to finish the paperwork faster. I didn't go closer to see how
high he was playing because he seemed antsy about other players being near him but I couldn't help
thinking that it makes a lot more sense to lower the bet so that a certain higher hand or lower,
full house and lower, for example, come in under the reporting cutoff.
> 
> 
> 
> That was probably Bob Dancer.

LOL. Maybe that's why he was glancing at me sideways.

But, seriously, if he was playing really high there wouldn't be much choice but if he is at a
relatively moderate level he should be able to figure out that getting less below the reporting
requirement can net more.