From: fffurken <>
Subject: Re: Make Italy Great Again
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id p12mr10007996qtl.59.1520225066720;
Sun, 04 Mar 2018 20:44:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id g18mr1515889vke.2.1520225066606; Sun,
04 Mar 2018 20:44:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 20:44:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=; posting-account=ooQ2cwkAAAD5fHesw79EWxuj2WdLyA1Z
References: <>
<> <>
<> <>
<> <>
<> <>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Make Italy Great Again
From: fffurken <>
Injection-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 04:44:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 47
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, 5 March 2018 04:11:01 UTC, BillB  wrote:

> So it was a valid word when you used it? Irish Mike was an Islamophobe 10 years ago, but  now he's
not an Islamophobe? That's your story and you're sticking to it?

How many times does it have to be explained to you before you'll understand it. I thought I put it
quite succinctly earlier on in the thread -

"Using the term 'Islamophobe' is reasonably understandable ten or fifteen years ago. Now? No."

That would obviously entail all of the wisdom and knowledge that would have come with those years
(for a normal, non-brainwashed person).

> What did you mean by "brainless nationalistic emotions"? I thought you were all about nationalism?
Or is this just another one of your youtube induced childlike phases?

I've always been a nationalist (check the archives).

> > Irish Mike was always "nationalistic" to the point that he supported (IRA) terrorism, something
we did not agree on. In fact, my (staunch) opposition to terrorism, whether it be Islamic or any
other kind, has always been consistent and impeccable.
> >
> have always been against terrorism?? INCREDIBLE CONSISTENCY!  lol

Well I think the point would be that I have not been in any way hypocritical. You can't accuse me of
not condemning terrorism in any way, shape or form. Whatever the cause.

> > Now tell us, what percentage of the 20% of "hardcore racists" in Western >democracies are
non-white, in your estimation?
> Probably about 10% of the 20% (so 2%). But white racism and non-white racism are not of the same
quality. Racism from a group that holds all the power is far more destructive and consequential than
racism from people who have no power.
> If you took a couple of introductory sociology courses you would already know that.

So you're saying that whites are NINE times more likely to be racist than blacks? This is your
defence of the sentiment attributed to you - that "racism comes in only one color and that color is
white", along with all the rest of your sociological blither? lol Yeah OK, sure. Whatevs.