From: da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: A weak 'President'
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!newsgate.cuhk.edu.hk!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 16:10:29 -0600
Subject: Re: A weak President
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
References: <17e861cc-43f2-43cc-9af2-a7e8a2e49633@googlegroups.com>
<cMidnVkAq43wXAfHnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com>
<%LDmC.112133$u94.45826@fx08.iad>
<ILydnY3MIoc_kAbHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com>
<BAFmC.64372$RQ3.25830@fx02.iad>
<04qdnb4Xr8GX3wbHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3KHmC.80277$s_2.44357@fx42.iad>
<AfmdnfR5C4ircAbHnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com>
<8UYmC.139492$NZ2.58637@fx40.iad>
<U_adnRrqNOgczQDHnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com>
<d9c55c9c-5b9d-4bbc-ad98-8ab918bd7cd8@googlegroups.com>
<f5idnS42b-GbPwDHnZ2dnUU7_81i4p2d@giganews.com>
<G1inC.36489$fQ7.36293@fx13.iad>
From: da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 16:10:28 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <G1inC.36489$fQ7.36293@fx13.iad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 180305-8, 03/05/2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Message-ID: <uLadncOEP6vLXQDHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 64
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-i1yJt2QKGu1ykTrmeGD2l4DMqS02drhtFux9HvSg34FjanPY72lPgZue4WDU3n+r8Nsb2PWashp3OXZ!1DhQ7yVZhAzbt+LlCOMod+wGNK17OCC3DoJIKu5tqbCVTcC6xvfIDLXFYwcaCO1JcTKM8vIhrTSw
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 4700
Print Article
Forward Article
On 3/5/2018 2:47 PM, Dutch wrote:
> On 3/5/2018 12:01 PM, da pickle wrote:
>> On 3/5/2018 1:13 PM, risky biz wrote:
>>> On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 6:13:30 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
>>>> On 3/4/2018 2:43 PM, Dutch wrote:
>>>>> On 3/4/2018 4:57 AM, da pickle wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The whole subject of the thread is an article about John Brennan
>>>>>
>>>>> The subject is not *about* John Brennan, that is just another
>>>>> transparent diversion. The subject is the instability of the current
>>>>> POTUS, a topic raised by Nicolle Wallace in an interview with John 
>>>>> Brennan.
>>>>
>>>> Is there some other opinion about the President presented in the 
>>>> article
>>>> other than the opinion of John Brennan?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The telling thing here is that you cannot factually refute a single
>>>>> point Brennan makes in the interview, so you choose to attack his
>>>>> credibility. I add numerous points which further illustrate the
>>>>> instability and unsuitability of this president and you attack my
>>>>> credibility. When are you going to wake up and realize that it is the
>>>>> credibility of your president that matters? When are you going to
>>>>> finally realize that this presidency constitutes a global crisis?
>>>>
>>>> Brennan states his opinion.  You apparently agree with his opinion
>>>> without more.  You have not supported your opinion with anything more
>>>> than your opinion and neither has he.  Everyone knows your opinion.
>>>
>>> You can safely bet that most Americans recognize John Brennan's 
>>> description of Donald Trump as an accurate description of the 
>>> behavior they can see themselves. Your brilliant idea that this 
>>> should be 'balanced' by the input of devotees of Donald Trump who 
>>> choose to ignore his behavior is just silly.
>>>
>>>> You may think your opinion is the only opinion worth considering, but
>>>> you could be wrong.
>>>>
>>>> You are so biased that you cannot see your own bias any more.
>>>>
>>>> You are the reflection of those that hated Obama so much that they 
>>>> could
>>>> not see even one thing about his presidency that was worthwhile.
>>
>> Your shouted opinion of your opinion does not raise it's validity at 
>> all.  People of faith are always quite sure of their beliefs.
> 
> Your attempt to reduce the issue down to a matter of political opinions 
> is desperate and unconvincing. A list of startling words and actions by 
> this president in just the past few days has been presented and you have 
> failed to explain or rationalize a single one of them. You can't, they 
> are all inexplicable. All you're doing is throwing up a smokescreen.

Actions speak louder than words ... you have only words ... your faith 
in your words is commendable.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com