From: risky biz <swingtrader@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A weak 'President'
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.200.25 with SMTP id c25mr12596935qkj.11.1520296781173;
Mon, 05 Mar 2018 16:39:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.173.2 with SMTP id w2mr1859074vke.10.1520296780982; Mon,
05 Mar 2018 16:39:40 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!t24no4131010qtn.0!news-out.google.com!a13ni807qtd.1!nntp.google.com!t24no4131006qtn.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 16:39:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <uLadncOEP6vLXQDHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.48.44.118; posting-account=6E1tdAoAAACWr5r8rFNJ0awN-fczz4Uf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.48.44.118
References: <17e861cc-43f2-43cc-9af2-a7e8a2e49633@googlegroups.com>
<cMidnVkAq43wXAfHnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <%LDmC.112133$u94.45826@fx08.iad>
<ILydnY3MIoc_kAbHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com> <BAFmC.64372$RQ3.25830@fx02.iad>
<04qdnb4Xr8GX3wbHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com> <3KHmC.80277$s_2.44357@fx42.iad>
<AfmdnfR5C4ircAbHnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <8UYmC.139492$NZ2.58637@fx40.iad>
<U_adnRrqNOgczQDHnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <d9c55c9c-5b9d-4bbc-ad98-8ab918bd7cd8@googlegroups.com>
<f5idnS42b-GbPwDHnZ2dnUU7_81i4p2d@giganews.com> <G1inC.36489$fQ7.36293@fx13.iad>
<uLadncOEP6vLXQDHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <36dd3adf-1a67-42bb-826b-8503559c61fc@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: A weak President
From: risky biz <swingtrader@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:39:41 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 78
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 2:10:39 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> On 3/5/2018 2:47 PM, Dutch wrote:
> > On 3/5/2018 12:01 PM, da pickle wrote:
> >> On 3/5/2018 1:13 PM, risky biz wrote:
> >>> On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 6:13:30 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> >>>> On 3/4/2018 2:43 PM, Dutch wrote:
> >>>>> On 3/4/2018 4:57 AM, da pickle wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The whole subject of the thread is an article about John Brennan
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The subject is not *about* John Brennan, that is just another
> >>>>> transparent diversion. The subject is the instability of the current
> >>>>> POTUS, a topic raised by Nicolle Wallace in an interview with John 
> >>>>> Brennan.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there some other opinion about the President presented in the 
> >>>> article
> >>>> other than the opinion of John Brennan?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> The telling thing here is that you cannot factually refute a single
> >>>>> point Brennan makes in the interview, so you choose to attack his
> >>>>> credibility. I add numerous points which further illustrate the
> >>>>> instability and unsuitability of this president and you attack my
> >>>>> credibility. When are you going to wake up and realize that it is the
> >>>>> credibility of your president that matters? When are you going to
> >>>>> finally realize that this presidency constitutes a global crisis?
> >>>>
> >>>> Brennan states his opinion.  You apparently agree with his opinion
> >>>> without more.  You have not supported your opinion with anything more
> >>>> than your opinion and neither has he.  Everyone knows your opinion.
> >>>
> >>> You can safely bet that most Americans recognize John Brennan's 
> >>> description of Donald Trump as an accurate description of the 
> >>> behavior they can see themselves. Your brilliant idea that this 
> >>> should be 'balanced' by the input of devotees of Donald Trump who 
> >>> choose to ignore his behavior is just silly.
> >>>
> >>>> You may think your opinion is the only opinion worth considering, but
> >>>> you could be wrong.
> >>>>
> >>>> You are so biased that you cannot see your own bias any more.
> >>>>
> >>>> You are the reflection of those that hated Obama so much that they 
> >>>> could
> >>>> not see even one thing about his presidency that was worthwhile.
> >>
> >> Your shouted opinion of your opinion does not raise it's validity at 
> >> all.  People of faith are always quite sure of their beliefs.
> > 
> > Your attempt to reduce the issue down to a matter of political opinions 
> > is desperate and unconvincing. A list of startling words and actions by 
> > this president in just the past few days has been presented and you have 
> > failed to explain or rationalize a single one of them. You can't, they 
> > are all inexplicable. All you're doing is throwing up a smokescreen.
> 
> Actions speak louder than words ... you have only words ... your faith 
> in your words is commendable.
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com

Speaking of weak.