From: risky biz <swingtrader@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A weak 'President'
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.42.150 with SMTP id b22mr12501088qta.43.1520299380177;
Mon, 05 Mar 2018 17:23:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.173.2 with SMTP id w2mr1868908vke.10.1520299380007; Mon,
05 Mar 2018 17:23:00 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!r16no4120915qtn.1!news-out.google.com!a13ni807qtd.1!nntp.google.com!t24no4147281qtn.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:22:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <JICdnbvwr4yGewDHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.48.44.118; posting-account=6E1tdAoAAACWr5r8rFNJ0awN-fczz4Uf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.48.44.118
References: <17e861cc-43f2-43cc-9af2-a7e8a2e49633@googlegroups.com>
<cMidnVkAq43wXAfHnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <%LDmC.112133$u94.45826@fx08.iad>
<ILydnY3MIoc_kAbHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com> <BAFmC.64372$RQ3.25830@fx02.iad>
<04qdnb4Xr8GX3wbHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com> <3KHmC.80277$s_2.44357@fx42.iad>
<AfmdnfR5C4ircAbHnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <8UYmC.139492$NZ2.58637@fx40.iad>
<U_adnRrqNOgczQDHnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <d9c55c9c-5b9d-4bbc-ad98-8ab918bd7cd8@googlegroups.com>
<f5idnS42b-GbPwDHnZ2dnUU7_81i4p2d@giganews.com> <G1inC.36489$fQ7.36293@fx13.iad>
<uLadncOEP6vLXQDHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com> <36dd3adf-1a67-42bb-826b-8503559c61fc@googlegroups.com>
<JICdnbvwr4yGewDHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f99f8e4d-17d7-4dae-81e4-cf9e546dc4a7@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: A weak President
From: risky biz <swingtrader@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 01:23:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 83
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 4:51:48 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> On 3/5/2018 6:39 PM, risky biz wrote:
> > On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 2:10:39 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> >> On 3/5/2018 2:47 PM, Dutch wrote:
> >>> On 3/5/2018 12:01 PM, da pickle wrote:
> >>>> On 3/5/2018 1:13 PM, risky biz wrote:
> >>>>> On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 6:13:30 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
> >>>>>> On 3/4/2018 2:43 PM, Dutch wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 3/4/2018 4:57 AM, da pickle wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The whole subject of the thread is an article about John Brennan
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The subject is not *about* John Brennan, that is just another
> >>>>>>> transparent diversion. The subject is the instability of the current
> >>>>>>> POTUS, a topic raised by Nicolle Wallace in an interview with John
> >>>>>>> Brennan.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Is there some other opinion about the President presented in the
> >>>>>> article
> >>>>>> other than the opinion of John Brennan?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The telling thing here is that you cannot factually refute a single
> >>>>>>> point Brennan makes in the interview, so you choose to attack his
> >>>>>>> credibility. I add numerous points which further illustrate the
> >>>>>>> instability and unsuitability of this president and you attack my
> >>>>>>> credibility. When are you going to wake up and realize that it is the
> >>>>>>> credibility of your president that matters? When are you going to
> >>>>>>> finally realize that this presidency constitutes a global crisis?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Brennan states his opinion.  You apparently agree with his opinion
> >>>>>> without more.  You have not supported your opinion with anything more
> >>>>>> than your opinion and neither has he.  Everyone knows your opinion.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can safely bet that most Americans recognize John Brennan's
> >>>>> description of Donald Trump as an accurate description of the
> >>>>> behavior they can see themselves. Your brilliant idea that this
> >>>>> should be 'balanced' by the input of devotees of Donald Trump who
> >>>>> choose to ignore his behavior is just silly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> You may think your opinion is the only opinion worth considering, but
> >>>>>> you could be wrong.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You are so biased that you cannot see your own bias any more.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You are the reflection of those that hated Obama so much that they
> >>>>>> could
> >>>>>> not see even one thing about his presidency that was worthwhile.
> >>>>
> >>>> Your shouted opinion of your opinion does not raise it's validity at
> >>>> all.  People of faith are always quite sure of their beliefs.
> >>>
> >>> Your attempt to reduce the issue down to a matter of political opinions
> >>> is desperate and unconvincing. A list of startling words and actions by
> >>> this president in just the past few days has been presented and you have
> >>> failed to explain or rationalize a single one of them. You can't, they
> >>> are all inexplicable. All you're doing is throwing up a smokescreen.
> >>
> >> Actions speak louder than words ... you have only words ... your faith
> >> in your words is commendable.
> > 
> > Speaking of weak.
> 
> The weak squeak.
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com

That's right. You squeak and Trump squeaks. It's kind of cute and definitely humorous.