From: Mossingen <>
Subject: Re: You want racism? I'll show you racism
Full headers:
From: "Mossingen" <>
Subject: Re: You want racism? Ill show you racism
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 17:38:07 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 2
Message-ID: <p7n8r5$ukv$>
References: <> <p7mhgq$vuu$> <t6CnC.115087$Cy2.654@fx44.iad> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 23:39:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:; posting-host="16a604780ae76c7580b7448fbb911378";
logging-data="31391"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18SxvF0c6jFIcXPbt2YqXRX6iYA2iN+muI="
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308
Importance: Normal
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wniOYTwu8835i4PjOuNhfVO5zjo=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Print Article
Forward Article
"BillB"  wrote in message

> Apartheid was based on skin color, why should the backlash be any 
> different?

>I already said that. It was the whites who organized politically around 
>their own whiteness. That was their choice. Now I'm supposed to call black 
>people the racist ones for fighting back against >their oppressors? Only in 
>Oklahoma would that illogic fly.

The question posed was whether the backlash was racist, not whether the 
backlash should have been different.  It is clearly racist.  Maybe it is 
also understandable, maybe even justified, but you can't seriously argue 
that it isn't racist in nature, as you seem to be doing.