From: Tim Norfolk <timsn274@aol.com>
Subject: Re: ACTIVE RGP WAGERS
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.154.131 with SMTP id c125mr14659202qke.42.1520390297392;
Tue, 06 Mar 2018 18:38:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.160.212 with SMTP id j203mr2220978vke.12.1520390297029;
Tue, 06 Mar 2018 18:38:17 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!r16no131145qtn.1!news-out.google.com!a13ni73qtd.1!nntp.google.com!r16no131143qtn.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 18:38:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0f1e4547-1ded-4471-b4d8-c296676e8a16@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.189.216.176;
posting-account=9tP_uwoAAAD1vfWhLdsNH4ImDfm7cP1K
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.189.216.176
References: <p7aja7$2fu$1@dont-email.me> <c5189551-99b2-4278-b520-3803154051fd@googlegroups.com>
<6564686d-0f3d-4d7d-a4d3-4819d0fba930@googlegroups.com> <27963d20-da64-49ce-8d29-dc03ae88b2f8@googlegroups.com>
<598c4c33-bf4f-4c8b-a283-688cf86fc6c8@googlegroups.com> <92a07069-8dfe-4621-8334-8e66192faf18@googlegroups.com>
<27b35c4e-f94e-414d-b3a9-98e1055a0b4e@googlegroups.com> <3e7387c7-b22a-4725-b3f0-753d56a67791@googlegroups.com>
<0a98be66-26ea-4607-8cf8-516df63b7131@googlegroups.com> <0f1e4547-1ded-4471-b4d8-c296676e8a16@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3c46cd73-bcfe-4376-a973-8dbf5f19deac@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: ACTIVE RGP WAGERS
From: Tim Norfolk <timsn274@aol.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 02:38:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 24
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 5:11:01 PM UTC-5, popinjay wrote:
> On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 1:47:57 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
> > On Monday, 5 March 2018 21:21:15 UTC, Tim Norfolk  wrote:
> > > On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 10:32:19 PM UTC-5, popinjay wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 6:04:00 PM UTC-8, Tim Norfolk wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Actually, there was, as the challenge included a bet I made with him. I even offered to
fly to Chicago.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > You said there was not a bet.  Now you say there was a bet.  At least one of those
statements is not true.  Maybe neither is true.  You like to stir up trouble, to violate the spirit
of cooperation at RGP.  I sense a rough childhood.
> > > 
> > > He wouldn't take a wager on his original statement, so I offered to make it me against him. He
dodged and weaved for some time.
> > > 
> > > As I said, I offered to come to him and compete, with a prize going to a charity of our
choosing.
> > 
> > Are you talking about mo_ron btw?
> 
> 
> 
> Mo used to bitch-slap him regularly.  He still hasn't gotten over it.

Actually, he used to run away when I asked him harder questions, such as the practical difference
between day trading and professional gambling with an edge.