From: da pickle <>
Subject: Re: A weak 'President'
Full headers:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 06:02:14 -0600
Subject: Re: A weak President
References: <>
From: da pickle <>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 06:02:28 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <eQlnC.36280$VM2.21223@fx01.iad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 180307-0, 03/07/2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Message-ID: <>
Lines: 75
X-Trace: sv3-lBOWtcqXTddzXzQdJpHpokJ8Ee88ZEuR8Ad5Si838o00XpTojfx5c8YNizZpL3yWqBSftpNG74gNCSa!cWYFrSxQn0MN8fYBa0KhrxdiSfygayTi0Y+4KZ8yuxG+OO6ISbWwAgf/5dUu7LSvlSjhx2LMXg==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 5403
Print Article
Forward Article
On 3/5/2018 7:06 PM, Dutch wrote:
> On 3/5/2018 2:10 PM, da pickle wrote:
>> On 3/5/2018 2:47 PM, Dutch wrote:
>>> On 3/5/2018 12:01 PM, da pickle wrote:
>>>> On 3/5/2018 1:13 PM, risky biz wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 6:13:30 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/4/2018 2:43 PM, Dutch wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/4/2018 4:57 AM, da pickle wrote:
>>>>>>>> The whole subject of the thread is an article about John Brennan
>>>>>>> The subject is not *about* John Brennan, that is just another
>>>>>>> transparent diversion. The subject is the instability of the current
>>>>>>> POTUS, a topic raised by Nicolle Wallace in an interview with 
>>>>>>> John Brennan.
>>>>>> Is there some other opinion about the President presented in the 
>>>>>> article
>>>>>> other than the opinion of John Brennan?
>>>>>>> The telling thing here is that you cannot factually refute a single
>>>>>>> point Brennan makes in the interview, so you choose to attack his
>>>>>>> credibility. I add numerous points which further illustrate the
>>>>>>> instability and unsuitability of this president and you attack my
>>>>>>> credibility. When are you going to wake up and realize that it is 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> credibility of your president that matters? When are you going to
>>>>>>> finally realize that this presidency constitutes a global crisis?
>>>>>> Brennan states his opinion.  You apparently agree with his opinion
>>>>>> without more.  You have not supported your opinion with anything more
>>>>>> than your opinion and neither has he.  Everyone knows your opinion.
>>>>> You can safely bet that most Americans recognize John Brennan's 
>>>>> description of Donald Trump as an accurate description of the 
>>>>> behavior they can see themselves. Your brilliant idea that this 
>>>>> should be 'balanced' by the input of devotees of Donald Trump who 
>>>>> choose to ignore his behavior is just silly.
>>>>>> You may think your opinion is the only opinion worth considering, but
>>>>>> you could be wrong.
>>>>>> You are so biased that you cannot see your own bias any more.
>>>>>> You are the reflection of those that hated Obama so much that they 
>>>>>> could
>>>>>> not see even one thing about his presidency that was worthwhile.
>>>> Your shouted opinion of your opinion does not raise it's validity at 
>>>> all.  People of faith are always quite sure of their beliefs.
>>> Your attempt to reduce the issue down to a matter of political 
>>> opinions is desperate and unconvincing. A list of startling words and 
>>> actions by this president in just the past few days has been 
>>> presented and you have failed to explain or rationalize a single one 
>>> of them. You can't, they are all inexplicable. All you're doing is 
>>> throwing up a smokescreen.
>> Actions speak louder than words ... you have only words ... your faith 
>> in your words is commendable.
> Spare me the platitudes. Pick just one of the recent controversies 
> coming out of this Whitehouse and we can discuss it rationally. We could 
> start with the president's suggestion that due process be suspended when 
> it comes to firearms, or the tariffs, or the military parade, there are 
> plenty to pick from. Let's get real.

You just don't know a joke when you hear it ... sarchasm alert!

This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.