From: da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: You want racism? I'll give you racism
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 07:02:35 -0600
Subject: Re: You want racism? Ill give you racism
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
References: <qf7s9d5lddnvuqr2miku07ofe5t0j4f7mi@4ax.com>
<cf9981e0-27a1-4563-9341-d0488ad641bc@googlegroups.com>
<ps7s9dpp9gcm7sc5u592umicgil8eok5fp@4ax.com>
<4179b193-fffe-4a7e-a7fa-d07731cee653@googlegroups.com>
<p7mi1p$a9u$1@dont-email.me>
<74696972-0ed8-4ab3-882a-cb93d5d4e67f@googlegroups.com>
<5bf0093c-1573-4e14-95f9-f6e0b8a7d2c4@googlegroups.com>
<I4InC.41449$fQ7.29319@fx13.iad> <dcmu9dladt80houpoqeum8jkshbdla22rq@4ax.com>
<3OMnC.117351$4_2.25469@fx35.iad>
<1e6v9dpe30h4rlmoiood1bd4upre9kvk8l@4ax.com> <S0NnC.48373$ma4.8870@fx10.iad>
From: da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 07:02:45 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <S0NnC.48373$ma4.8870@fx10.iad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 180307-0, 03/07/2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Message-ID: <HaudnfTYUo1wfwLHnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 75
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-pfk/r1O7iPrARZI+g5jugEXKrwfj+A5uDPRnb/r4u7ictSi+tqkCyMSVnJEEJJ/xz27PjEwvHZVB/Sx!fqFC3jb/poQwl/IzNwquYJFX2iKWKOzXJskpYm4uEZmMuxPfmjhZfovBUDLLnhZyrLIjNyYcZA==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 5058
Print Article
Forward Article
On 3/7/2018 2:02 AM, Dutch wrote:
> On 3/6/2018 11:51 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 23:47:11 -0800, Dutch<no@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/6/2018 7:26 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 18:25:32 -0800, Dutch<no@email.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/6/2018 12:28 PM, fffurken wrote:
>>>>>> On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 18:56:42 UTC, Tim Norfolk  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Didn't you get the memo? Racism is only by white people, as it 
>>>>>>> has been re-defined as discrimination plus power, as has sexism.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only by members of the loony liberal left, such as the Canadian 
>>>>>> dhimmi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sane people know what racism is. Which isn't, by the way, the 
>>>>>> belief that not all races are equal, as Dutch recently stated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's do a thought experiment. Say a white couple decides to adopt a
>>>>> family and they adopt one infant of each race. Assume that the 
>>>>> children
>>>>> all receive the same upbringing and education and none is subjected to
>>>>> any more bullying or discrimination during childhood than the others.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's further assume that once they are adults none of them are
>>>>> subjected to discrimination in hiring or in any other realm.
>>>>>
>>>>> What would predict would be the likely outcome of this scenario for
>>>>> these children, if the experiment was repeated thousands of times?
>>>>
>>>> We already know what you, like all liberals, think. That's because you
>>>> won't accept that human nature exists, and if you do, you believe you
>>>> can change it. This is your utopia, where everyone is treated
>>>> properly, so every outcome is great. But I tell you what would happen
>>>> in your scenario - some of them are likely to turn into virulent
>>>> racists, some of them will hate, some of them will fail in life. You
>>>> know why? Because they are fucking human, that's why. There isn't a
>>>> fucking thing you can do about it.
>>>>
>>>> Something you folks always forget is that these experiments have been
>>>> tried. In fact, pretty much any experiment you can think of has been
>>>> tried, but they all fall into obscurity because they don't produce the
>>>> wanted results.
>>>>
>>>> While you think about all this, why don't you explain black slaves
>>>> owned by blacks? How about white slaves of black owners? After you
>>>> educate yourself we can go back to skin color considerations.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I can't be bothered to wade through all that. Could you please just give
>>> me a direct answer to my hypothetical?
>>
>> I did, about halfway down in the first paragraph I wrote.
>>
> 
> I see, OK. But my actual question is, all things being equal, as they 
> are in my hypothetical scenario, do you believe there would be a 
> significant difference in outcomes among the children that you can 
> attribute to race?
> 
> And I do not believe the exact scenario I described has ever been tried, 
> because it's not possible in the real world. There is no prejudice-free 
> environment.

First, you must define and differentiate biological "races" ... no 
races, no difference (by definition).



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com