From: Bill Vanek <>
Subject: Re: You want racism? I'll give you racism
Full headers:
From: Bill Vanek <>
Subject: Re: You want racism? Ill give you racism
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 09:04:15 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 73
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <p7mi1p$a9u$> <> <> <I4InC.41449$fQ7.29319@fx13.iad> <> <3OMnC.117351$4_2.25469@fx35.iad> <> <S0NnC.48373$ma4.8870@fx10.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="06f2dd0dfb90150a35d01189dcb49beb";
logging-data="21334"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18BsdkZKwtMf2QsZ6VHc4a8GgZSYBvfZ+A="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zuOdkraS6Q2o+rFqnIBjtgG2OGE=
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 00:02:57 -0800, Dutch<> wrote:

>On 3/6/2018 11:51 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 23:47:11 -0800, Dutch<> wrote:
>>> On 3/6/2018 7:26 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 18:25:32 -0800, Dutch<> wrote:
>>>>> On 3/6/2018 12:28 PM, fffurken wrote:
>>>>>> On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 18:56:42 UTC, Tim Norfolk  wrote:
>>>>>>> Didn't you get the memo? Racism is only by white people, as it has been re-defined as
discrimination plus power, as has sexism.
>>>>>> Only by members of the loony liberal left, such as the Canadian dhimmi.
>>>>>> Sane people know what racism is. Which isn't, by the way, the belief that not all races are
equal, as Dutch recently stated.
>>>>> Let's do a thought experiment. Say a white couple decides to adopt a
>>>>> family and they adopt one infant of each race. Assume that the children
>>>>> all receive the same upbringing and education and none is subjected to
>>>>> any more bullying or discrimination during childhood than the others.
>>>>> Let's further assume that once they are adults none of them are
>>>>> subjected to discrimination in hiring or in any other realm.
>>>>> What would predict would be the likely outcome of this scenario for
>>>>> these children, if the experiment was repeated thousands of times?
>>>> We already know what you, like all liberals, think. That's because you
>>>> won't accept that human nature exists, and if you do, you believe you
>>>> can change it. This is your utopia, where everyone is treated
>>>> properly, so every outcome is great. But I tell you what would happen
>>>> in your scenario - some of them are likely to turn into virulent
>>>> racists, some of them will hate, some of them will fail in life. You
>>>> know why? Because they are fucking human, that's why. There isn't a
>>>> fucking thing you can do about it.
>>>> Something you folks always forget is that these experiments have been
>>>> tried. In fact, pretty much any experiment you can think of has been
>>>> tried, but they all fall into obscurity because they don't produce the
>>>> wanted results.
>>>> While you think about all this, why don't you explain black slaves
>>>> owned by blacks? How about white slaves of black owners? After you
>>>> educate yourself we can go back to skin color considerations.
>>> I can't be bothered to wade through all that. Could you please just give
>>> me a direct answer to my hypothetical?
>> I did, about halfway down in the first paragraph I wrote.
>I see, OK. But my actual question is, all things being equal, as they 
>are in my hypothetical scenario, do you believe there would be a 
>significant difference in outcomes among the children that you can 
>attribute to race?

Of course. There is a genetic component to IQ. If your experiment were
tried thousands of times, there would be a pattern. I don't think
there is any agreement on how "significant" the variance would be,
though. The other problem is what Pickle mentions, that there is
significant blurring among the races after so many years of human
life. Where do you find the subjects of your experiment?

>And I do not believe the exact scenario I described has ever been tried, 
>because it's not possible in the real world. There is no prejudice-free 

And that is at least part of my point. Once you understand why there
is no such environment, and never will be, you will move closer to the
smart (conservative) understanding of real life.