From: Dutch <no@email.com>
Subject: Re: You want racism? I'll give you racism
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx12.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: You want racism? Ill give you racism
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
References: <8d9392b9-e7d1-40b9-9c80-81580d622eca@googlegroups.com>
<p7l3nv$uf1$1@dont-email.me>
<939dd99d-39d1-4ad6-902e-b2b564e0ef6b@googlegroups.com>
<qf7s9d5lddnvuqr2miku07ofe5t0j4f7mi@4ax.com>
<cf9981e0-27a1-4563-9341-d0488ad641bc@googlegroups.com>
<ps7s9dpp9gcm7sc5u592umicgil8eok5fp@4ax.com>
<4179b193-fffe-4a7e-a7fa-d07731cee653@googlegroups.com>
<p7mi1p$a9u$1@dont-email.me>
<74696972-0ed8-4ab3-882a-cb93d5d4e67f@googlegroups.com>
<5bf0093c-1573-4e14-95f9-f6e0b8a7d2c4@googlegroups.com>
<I4InC.41449$fQ7.29319@fx13.iad>
<ab31c527-7da4-4d28-981e-0ddf7e20c4f2@googlegroups.com>
<kGInC.156070$9%2.20345@fx36.iad>
<114cf916-c69a-4d71-bd43-e1e1d02ed2bb@googlegroups.com>
<TLMnC.41452$fQ7.11008@fx13.iad>
<f2537552-9bdf-4525-b3ed-6f0b7d51bf17@googlegroups.com>
<f18933dc-602f-48cf-814f-0e8e2f814bdf@googlegroups.com>
<1a7c1cc9-aa61-45d0-ab99-0217c9226e23@googlegroups.com>
<b2c1d328-b247-45e7-81f1-a02fbe88391d@googlegroups.com>
<00c0a906-b78f-40d0-b176-0befab3d0807@googlegroups.com>
From: Dutch <no@email.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <00c0a906-b78f-40d0-b176-0befab3d0807@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <2d1oC.66649$rk4.17900@fx12.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 02:28:14 UTC
Organization: UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 18:28:13 -0800
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2499724923
X-Received-Bytes: 4701
Print Article
Forward Article
On 3/7/2018 5:53 PM, BillB wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 5:26:40 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 19:19:28 UTC, fffurken  wrote:
>>
>>>> Uh, dumb fuck, that is literally the #1 dictionary definition of racist.
>>>
>>> No it isn't
>>
>> lol I just looked up the definition of 'racism'.
>>
>> https://tinyurl.com/y8wdbmmb
>>
>> noun
>>
>> prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on
the belief that one's own race is superior.
>>
>> "a programme to combat racism"
>> synonyms: racial discrimination, racialism, racial prejudice/bigotry, xenophobia, chauvinism,
bigotry, bias, intolerance; More
>>
>> the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities
specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or
races.
>> "theories of racism"
>>
>> Compare with my post - https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.gambling.poker/fkWIXCJ3UpY/Xr7vG...
>>
>> So even with Billb's silly "dictionary definition" ploy.. fffurken nailed it again.
> 
> lol...how far did you make in school? Seriously...you are dumb as fuck. Is this alcohol induced
dementia? Why do you keep coming back time and time again for another bitchslapping?
> 
>   You said, "the belief that not all races are equal does not a racist make, as you stated."
> 
> If you don't believe all races are equal, it follows logically that you think some races are
superior to others.
> 
> rac·ist
> ˈrāsəst/Submit
> noun
> 1.
> a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, OR who
believes that a particular race is superior to another.
> 
> 
> I don't discriminate between races (in fact, it has been scientifically proven that I am among the
minority of people who have no racial preferences, even on a subliminal or subconscious level). I
don't think any race is superior (i.e. I think they are equal). Therefore, I am not a racist. You
most certainly are a racist.
> 

You seem to believe that once you have identified that a person holds 
some view that falls under a definition like "racist" or "Islamophobe" 
that the discussion is over and you have won. This is misguided and 
superficial.

For example, it seems obvious that blacks on average are superior to 
whites in the field of sprinting, and basketball. This should not be 
seen as a racist statement yet it fits the definition. Yet one were to 
propose that whites are superior to blacks in some realm related to 
abstract thinking, or creativity, just for example, that probably would. 
Political correctness always clouds clear thinking.

I'd conclude that your dictionary definition falls way short, in fact it 
misses the point almost entirely.