Subject: Re: You want racism? I'll give you racism
On 3/7/2018 8:45 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 20:03:34 -0800, Dutch<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On 3/7/2018 7:09 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>>> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 15:12:08 -0800, Dutch<email@example.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/7/2018 2:57 PM, fffurken wrote:
>>>>> lol.. that doesn't even remotely resemble an argument. It sounds more like leftist claptrap.
>>>> What it means is that differences between individuals is far more
>>>> pronounced that differences between races. If the range of normal IQs
>>>> among most whites is 90-110 and the range among black is 85-105, what
>>>> are the chances that you're smarter than a random black guy? That's
>>>> ignoring any cultural bias in IQ tests and the differences in
>>>> opportunity and environment.
>>> WTF does that have to do with what we're talking about? If the black
>>> range is lower, why is it forbidden among the pseudo-intelligentsia to
>>> say it? And I think you made those numbers up.
>> It is forbidden to talk about differences in IQ between races because
>> such discussion is usually an alias for out and out racism. And yes, I
>> did make up the numbers.
> You also made up that "alias" thing. Liberal boilerplate. Try harder.
If I coined the term, which I did, that is the opposite of a
boilerplate. I think it is perfectly acceptable to have a good faith
sincere discussion about race and IQ, but not with a racist.