From: Dutch <no@email.com>
Subject: Re: You want racism? I'll give you racism
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.15.11 with SMTP id e11mr17164497qtk.42.1520490067656;
Wed, 07 Mar 2018 22:21:07 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!r16no785654qtn.1!news-out.google.com!a13ni298qtd.1!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!fx31.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: You want racism? Ill give you racism
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
References: <3OMnC.117351$4_2.25469@fx35.iad>
<1e6v9dpe30h4rlmoiood1bd4upre9kvk8l@4ax.com> <S0NnC.48373$ma4.8870@fx10.iad>
<d960adh929k7l9bhji59emmciq8ea4crqe@4ax.com> <xeZnC.126475$qc.90669@fx04.iad>
<af8391e5-0397-4974-a3d7-9cfa027569ae@googlegroups.com>
<7ZZnC.66646$rk4.47847@fx12.iad> <al71ad5nnqa5kcd27j438tql49sg782q0s@4ax.com>
<cl81ad1bgj9alt60ak599o25fhiuf3c3i1@4ax.com> <Ky1oC.58243$Mx3.11351@fx18.iad>
<30a1adtgqapntb5eveml30achb7149dc5o@4ax.com> <pA2oC.58574$Mx3.58108@fx18.iad>
<1vf1adtocrikusa4q2lkabhblmkn4l70se@4ax.com>
From: Dutch <no@email.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1vf1adtocrikusa4q2lkabhblmkn4l70se@4ax.com>
Lines: 88
Message-ID: <nD4oC.49870$9W2.45478@fx31.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 06:21:07 UTC
Organization: UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 22:21:06 -0800
X-Received-Bytes: 5779
X-Received-Body-CRC: 710859432
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 5717
Print Article
Forward Article
On 3/7/2018 8:50 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 20:01:25 -0800, Dutch<no@email.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/7/2018 7:06 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>>> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 18:51:22 -0800, Dutch<no@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/7/2018 6:43 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 07 Mar 2018 21:26:02 -0500, Seymore4Head<no@none.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 14:46:26 -0800, Dutch<no@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/7/2018 2:27 PM, fffurken wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 21:56:49 UTC, Dutch  wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you referring to *intelligence* when you say "IQ"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll ding anytime you disagree with Sam Harris with a t=placement from the video I posted
previously (ding) -
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGp06vMPERE&t=123
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey, you know, this could be a good thing. I've always said that you're a Sam Harris parrot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Btw, you can start a YouTube video (at a certain place) but you can't stop it so it's for
the viewers discretion how long to watch (shouldn't take more than a few seconds) just ding back
when you hear it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll offer this from the comments,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "I have noticed over the years, that my fellow whites that talk the most
>>>>>>> about "white peoples IQ superiority", are usually lacking in a few
>>>>>>> chromosomes themselves. Einstein barely talked about his own
>>>>>>> intelligence, great philosophers of history have said things like "the
>>>>>>> wiser I become, the more foolish I realize I am". Its always the apes of
>>>>>>> our "racial groups" that spout off at the mouth. Sad really.?"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, inasmuch as there are racial differences in intelligence revealed by
>>>>>>> IQ tests, which I contend suffer from cultural bias, the differences
>>>>>>> create overlapping ranges of IQs. And those people who make racial IQ an
>>>>>>> issue are revealing themselves to be not well situated on this range.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you think Black special interest groups have not created an IQ
>>>>>> test that doesn't have cultural bias?
>>>>>
>>>>> Because even if it were biased towards black culture, whites would ace
>>>>> it, and blacks would fumble.
>>>>>
>>>>> I remember this argument on Johnny Carson, of all things, years ago.
>>>>> Some black advocates came on to demonstrate this cultural bias thing,
>>>>> and although Carson feigned surprise, any half-awake white guy would
>>>>> have gotten every answer right. Carson had some class, and I certainly
>>>>> don't blame him for playing dumb.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> IQ tests do not tend to test knowledge of any particular pop culture,
>>>> but they test patterns of thinking and association that depend on how
>>>> your brain is organized to solve problems. People who receive a good
>>>> western education while having talents in this area are going to surpass
>>>> those with talents that receive a poor education and/or have a stressful
>>>> family life, poverty etc..
>>>
>>> I don't get it. You're the one who keeps throwing this cultural bias
>>> thing around. So what are you talking about? A shit education and
>>> poverty are not part of cultural bias. Are you saying that blacks have
>>> a culture of disdain for learning and money?
>>
>> Are you actually claiming that inner city schools with predominantly
>> black students are given the same budgets and quality of teachers as
>> those in rich areas?
> 
> Of course not. So let's talk about who has complete control of the US
> education system. You ducked this last time, so let's try again. Is it
> the liberals and their liberal union buddies, the ones who teach group
> identity, and the lies that everything that happens to black kids is
> whitey's fault, and that nothing is every their own fault, or
> conservatives, who try to teach self-worth, self-sufficiency, self
> reliance, and individualism?
> 
> Remember, if there is no parental support, it's up to the schools to
> mold these kids. And the liberals have done a great job of producing
> generations of kids whose lifetime career choice is government
> handouts. And of course, if some parents want to get their kids out of
> those failed schools, the liberals fight them with all they have. The
> liberals have written these kids off, and yet you support them. You
> should be ashamed.
> 

Again, you confuse your extreme bias against liberals with reality.