From: Dutch <no@email.com>
Subject: Re: You want racism? I'll give you racism
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.unit0.net!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!fx03.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: You want racism? Ill give you racism
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
References: <S0NnC.48373$ma4.8870@fx10.iad>
<d960adh929k7l9bhji59emmciq8ea4crqe@4ax.com> <xeZnC.126475$qc.90669@fx04.iad>
<af8391e5-0397-4974-a3d7-9cfa027569ae@googlegroups.com>
<7ZZnC.66646$rk4.47847@fx12.iad> <al71ad5nnqa5kcd27j438tql49sg782q0s@4ax.com>
<cl81ad1bgj9alt60ak599o25fhiuf3c3i1@4ax.com> <Ky1oC.58243$Mx3.11351@fx18.iad>
<30a1adtgqapntb5eveml30achb7149dc5o@4ax.com> <pA2oC.58574$Mx3.58108@fx18.iad>
<1vf1adtocrikusa4q2lkabhblmkn4l70se@4ax.com> <nD4oC.49870$9W2.45478@fx31.iad>
<j6m1adtervg4658jk1g1rac6n2gh0e1boh@4ax.com>
From: Dutch <no@email.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <j6m1adtervg4658jk1g1rac6n2gh0e1boh@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 97
Message-ID: <im7oC.75205$tK5.28758@fx03.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 09:27:42 UTC
Organization: UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 01:27:41 -0800
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2318983558
X-Received-Bytes: 6384
Print Article
Forward Article
On 3/7/2018 10:32 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 22:21:06 -0800, Dutch<no@email.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/7/2018 8:50 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>>> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 20:01:25 -0800, Dutch<no@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/7/2018 7:06 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 18:51:22 -0800, Dutch<no@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/7/2018 6:43 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 07 Mar 2018 21:26:02 -0500, Seymore4Head<no@none.invalid>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 14:46:26 -0800, Dutch<no@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 3/7/2018 2:27 PM, fffurken wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 21:56:49 UTC, Dutch  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Are you referring to *intelligence* when you say "IQ"?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll ding anytime you disagree with Sam Harris with a t=placement from the video I posted
previously (ding) -
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGp06vMPERE&t=123
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hey, you know, this could be a good thing. I've always said that you're a Sam Harris
parrot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Btw, you can start a YouTube video (at a certain place) but you can't stop it so it's for
the viewers discretion how long to watch (shouldn't take more than a few seconds) just ding back
when you hear it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll offer this from the comments,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "I have noticed over the years, that my fellow whites that talk the most
>>>>>>>>> about "white peoples IQ superiority", are usually lacking in a few
>>>>>>>>> chromosomes themselves. Einstein barely talked about his own
>>>>>>>>> intelligence, great philosophers of history have said things like "the
>>>>>>>>> wiser I become, the more foolish I realize I am". Its always the apes of
>>>>>>>>> our "racial groups" that spout off at the mouth. Sad really.?"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, inasmuch as there are racial differences in intelligence revealed by
>>>>>>>>> IQ tests, which I contend suffer from cultural bias, the differences
>>>>>>>>> create overlapping ranges of IQs. And those people who make racial IQ an
>>>>>>>>> issue are revealing themselves to be not well situated on this range.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why do you think Black special interest groups have not created an IQ
>>>>>>>> test that doesn't have cultural bias?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because even if it were biased towards black culture, whites would ace
>>>>>>> it, and blacks would fumble.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I remember this argument on Johnny Carson, of all things, years ago.
>>>>>>> Some black advocates came on to demonstrate this cultural bias thing,
>>>>>>> and although Carson feigned surprise, any half-awake white guy would
>>>>>>> have gotten every answer right. Carson had some class, and I certainly
>>>>>>> don't blame him for playing dumb.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IQ tests do not tend to test knowledge of any particular pop culture,
>>>>>> but they test patterns of thinking and association that depend on how
>>>>>> your brain is organized to solve problems. People who receive a good
>>>>>> western education while having talents in this area are going to surpass
>>>>>> those with talents that receive a poor education and/or have a stressful
>>>>>> family life, poverty etc..
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't get it. You're the one who keeps throwing this cultural bias
>>>>> thing around. So what are you talking about? A shit education and
>>>>> poverty are not part of cultural bias. Are you saying that blacks have
>>>>> a culture of disdain for learning and money?
>>>>
>>>> Are you actually claiming that inner city schools with predominantly
>>>> black students are given the same budgets and quality of teachers as
>>>> those in rich areas?
>>>
>>> Of course not. So let's talk about who has complete control of the US
>>> education system. You ducked this last time, so let's try again. Is it
>>> the liberals and their liberal union buddies, the ones who teach group
>>> identity, and the lies that everything that happens to black kids is
>>> whitey's fault, and that nothing is every their own fault, or
>>> conservatives, who try to teach self-worth, self-sufficiency, self
>>> reliance, and individualism?
>>>
>>> Remember, if there is no parental support, it's up to the schools to
>>> mold these kids. And the liberals have done a great job of producing
>>> generations of kids whose lifetime career choice is government
>>> handouts. And of course, if some parents want to get their kids out of
>>> those failed schools, the liberals fight them with all they have. The
>>> liberals have written these kids off, and yet you support them. You
>>> should be ashamed.
>>>
>>
>> Again, you confuse your extreme bias against liberals with reality.
> 
> Then tell me who really runs the schools here.
> 

Schools don't teach kids to grow up and go on welfare. As usual, your 
anti-liberal bias leads you directly to facile, silly conclusions.