From: Dutch <no@email.com>
Subject: Re: You want racism? I'll give you racism
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.34.148 with SMTP id f20mr20154223qta.28.1520537683917;
Thu, 08 Mar 2018 11:34:43 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!t24no1124819qtn.0!news-out.google.com!a13ni403qtd.1!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!fx03.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: You want racism? Ill give you racism
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
References: <8d9392b9-e7d1-40b9-9c80-81580d622eca@googlegroups.com>
<cf9981e0-27a1-4563-9341-d0488ad641bc@googlegroups.com>
<ps7s9dpp9gcm7sc5u592umicgil8eok5fp@4ax.com>
<4179b193-fffe-4a7e-a7fa-d07731cee653@googlegroups.com>
<p7mi1p$a9u$1@dont-email.me>
<74696972-0ed8-4ab3-882a-cb93d5d4e67f@googlegroups.com>
<5bf0093c-1573-4e14-95f9-f6e0b8a7d2c4@googlegroups.com>
<I4InC.41449$fQ7.29319@fx13.iad>
<ab31c527-7da4-4d28-981e-0ddf7e20c4f2@googlegroups.com>
<kGInC.156070$9%2.20345@fx36.iad>
<114cf916-c69a-4d71-bd43-e1e1d02ed2bb@googlegroups.com>
<TLMnC.41452$fQ7.11008@fx13.iad>
<f2537552-9bdf-4525-b3ed-6f0b7d51bf17@googlegroups.com>
<f18933dc-602f-48cf-814f-0e8e2f814bdf@googlegroups.com>
<p7ph6b$c85$1@dont-email.me>
<03f2662e-6819-48e2-a21d-3282032e9ff2@googlegroups.com>
<bfb68747-e9f6-4014-b214-24b8439f1d04@googlegroups.com>
<p7roll$qjm$1@dont-email.me>
<2e6fc4d3-1808-4de9-baf2-8e8d2cc4b2bc@googlegroups.com>
<e2138173-850d-44be-8d92-3df7fe2a3ff4@googlegroups.com>
From: Dutch <no@email.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e2138173-850d-44be-8d92-3df7fe2a3ff4@googlegroups.com>
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <nfgoC.80380$tK5.59652@fx03.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 19:34:43 UTC
Organization: UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:34:42 -0800
X-Received-Bytes: 2938
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1871980655
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 2876
Print Article
Forward Article
On 3/8/2018 10:42 AM, fffurken wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 March 2018 18:14:57 UTC, BillB  wrote:
>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 8:34:01 AM UTC-8, Mossingen wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'm pretty sure he has not.
>>
>> Do you ever tire of being wrong??
>>
>>> BillB seems to form a lot of his opinions these
>>> days based on videos he hasn't seen.
>>
>> Another false statement.
>>
>>> Brand is a joke.  He's one of these
>>> entertainer/celebrity types who think they're smart, and then when they have
>>> a conversation with someone who actually is smart, it really shows.
>>
>> Russell Brand is smart.
> 
> lofl.. This is actually worse than admitting that you never watched the video.
> 
> Although I can see why you might look up to an empty vessel like Brand.
> 
> Btw, I watched a good bit of his (Brand's) interview with Jordan Peterson in which, in fairness,
he was much better. (This was after the Cathy Newman debacle though).
> 

Jordan Peterson is not as clinically logical as Sam Harris, so Russell 
is naturally going to look better next to him. They both dwell in the 
"soft science". I listened to a lot of the second Peterson-Harris debate 
and Peterson does not exactly shine.