From: trotsky <>
Subject: Re: "Parks and Recreation" creator regrets hiring Louis C.K.
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id x10mr693741ita.35.1510312303251;
Fri, 10 Nov 2017 03:11:43 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: "Parks and Recreation" creator regrets hiring Louis C.K.
References: <>
From: trotsky <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <OPfNB.612$7A2.110@fx29.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:11:42 UTC
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 05:11:42 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 1922
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3967062775
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Original-Bytes: 1860
Print Article
Forward Article
On 11/9/17 6:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> moviePig<> wrote:
>> On 11/9/2017 6:22 PM, David wrote:
>>> Mike Schur Apologizes for Having Louis C.K. on Parks and Recreation
>>> After Hearing Sexual-Harassment Rumors
>>> By Hunter Harris
>>> Parks and Recreation creator Mike Schur has apologized for including
>>> Louis C.K. in episodes of the NBC sitcom. “I don’t remember when I
>>> heard the rumors about him,” Schur tweeted minutes after a New York
>>> Times exposé detailed two decades of C.K.’s alleged misconduct. “But
>>> I’m sure it was before the last time he was on Parks and Rec. And that
>>> sucks. And I’m sorry.”
>> This is what I'd call 'getting out in front of it'...
> It's what I'd call crossing the line into ridiculousness.

I'd call it 20/20 hindsight, as would most intelligent people.