From: W/Q <>
Subject: Re: Sexual Assault Frenzy Becoming Comical
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id 21mr7147180qtx.26.1510344141891;
Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:02:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id y18mr774110vky.6.1510344141696; Fri,
10 Nov 2017 12:02:21 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:02:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ou4srk$gh0$>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=; posting-account=2LeuvQgAAAD5A55A9p2Z_lnlAGUtHJ2c
References: <>
<ou2rto$h8h$> <>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Sexual Assault Frenzy Becoming Comical
From: "W/Q" <>
Injection-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 20:02:21 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 39
Print Article
Forward Article
On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 1:57:58 PM UTC-5, Rhino wrote:
> On 2017-11-09 7:42 PM, W/Q wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 7:29:46 PM UTC-5, Rhino wrote:
> >> On 2017-11-09 5:02 PM, W/Q wrote:
> >>> It's turning into an avalanche.  Now controversial Republican Alabama politician Roy Moore and
Charlie Sheen are accused of having sex with kids, the latter with Corey Haim when he was 13. If
this keeps up, there'll come a saturation point when it'll all become too farcical to take seriously
anymore because, in reality, probably a third of humanity, if not more, has had sex with kids, even
when they were kids at the time themselves.  This is going to hugely backlog the courts the more
accusations keep popping up left, right and center unabated.
> >>>
> >> Hmm. How do I put this tactfully? Let me see.... Okay, got it: You are
> >> NUTS. Stark raving mad. A prime candidate for the psycho ward nearest you.
> >>
> >> The vast vast majority of people have not EVER had sex with a kid. I
> >> defy you to produce ANY verifiable evidence for your ridiculous assertion.
> > 
> > 
> > Well, if I said a third of humanity has had it, then that means the vast majority - two-thirds,
or 66% if numbers impress you - haven't.  Gee, you're mathematically dumb.
> > 
> So just another assertion and nothing resembling proof? Yeah, that's 
> what I expected....
> As for "vast vast majority", I suppose I should have said 99.99% so that 
> you couldn't quibble about word meanings.

Yeah, you should've.  Even though there's no such thing as a "vast vast" majority.  It's either
"vast" or it isn't.