From: Adam H. Kerman <>
Subject: Re: How can these sexual harassers save their careers?
Full headers:
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <>
Subject: Re: How can these sexual harassers save their careers?
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 22:15:37 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <ou58e9$iu8$>
References: <ou4lpc$liq$> <> <> <>
X-Trace: rffZ4nKqrGOmMCSEEhxMGFZOKGYmTyeqkKIV4prGfjHnvUYtlt4M2W2OkHW/m7LUWj5WHqS1Rdy67lrOwZxfF0kYCFT33ODVXtT1mfOCoJGKhXobLyyn4oMtiJuqquco
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 22:15:37 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:; logging-data="42B60keUd3EeoAYprdNqNQN2AwwckXAKiz6xvC0M8mJDRGO/9fkeHZUL7sQK5WMqkx8pQ2w+fsPsJgwyMmSul9nwAySdQ+dQL/RCQzAs+KSTeNj6epPZT6wwELWg1eSm"; mail-complaints-to=""
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uELhjqs5OMwvtmedB/Jl0XLk6Nk=
Print Article
Forward Article
BTR1701<address_is@invalid.invalid> wrote:
><> wrote:
>>On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 12:24:28 PM UTC-5, Ubiquitous wrote:
>>> wrote:

>>>>Every one of the accused should promise to name 10 other men that they
>>>>heard rumors about who harassed women. It can be as simple as some man
>>>>in a bad mood speaking harshly to a woman or lashing out at her for
>>>>something she had nothing to do with. It would be best if the incident
>>>>happened so long ago that there's no way to verify it, better still if
>>>>the woman in question is fictional, dead, or has no recollection of the

>>>>Lack of any ability to verify will be no problem at all, as these days,
>>>>journalism standards don't prevent rumors from being published in print
>>>>or on line.

>>>The correct answer is: Go into politics as Democrats.

>>Prove it. Show us a democrat elected-official who harassed a girl. Go ahead. Show us.

>Well, Teddy Kennedy killed one and suffered no negative career

That it was possibly a case of unprosecuted reckless homicide is not
as bad versus sexual harassment. C'mon. You know better than that.