Subject: Re: How can these sexual harassers save their careers?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 16:53:14 -0600
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.1.8 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bKLeiy0GbOuD51rckErkXrO5Aoo=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Message-ID: <459362914.532046763.250428.address_is-invalid.invalid@news.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: How can these sexual harassers save their careers?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: BTR1701 <address_is@invalid.invalid>
References: <ou4lpc$liq$2@dont-email.me>
<ztydnb8vPqVcfZjHnZ2dnUU7-XOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<1fc24af5-c74c-4b6b-ba47-7bdba6f992cc@googlegroups.com>
<63237389.532036226.588753.address_is-invalid.invalid@news.giganews.com>
<ou54fd$9ma$4@dont-email.me>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 16:53:14 -0600
Lines: 36
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-mg0d91xGDImX7bgivz0l3v0662GCdKyhct034q23dHZj9iB6Xd0AYAf76gMg0pNl/KYEaHRCnG/mVIq!HowT89TxRDXcSnM5tj9/gHfrj8VOdg90rmClj0p4+/fZL/Qh/FjSdPtT1G8DpVenXCvYw6sWXnFX!qP5ulSkmtJZyTY+6K45rUYeWtx5aXng=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2880
Print Article
Forward Article
FPP<fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/10/17 3:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>><mogulah@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 12:24:28 PM UTC-5, Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>> In article <ou4lpc$liq$2@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Every one of the accused should promise to name 10 other men that they
>>>>> heard rumors about who harassed women. It can be as simple as some man
>>>>> in a bad mood speaking harshly to a woman or lashing out at her for
>>>>> something she had nothing to do with. It would be best if the incident
>>>>> happened so long ago that there's no way to verify it, better still if
>>>>> the woman in question is fictional, dead, or has no recollection of the
>>>>> incident.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Lack of any ability to verify will be no problem at all, as these days,
>>>>> journalism standards don't prevent rumors from being published in print
>>>>> or on line.
>>>> 
>>>> The correct answer is: Go into politics as Democrats.
>>> 
>>> Prove it. Show us a democrat elected-official who harassed a girl. Go ahead. Show us.
>> 
>> Well, Teddy Kennedy killed one and suffered no negative career
>> consequences.
> 
> So did Joe Scarborough.
> Ditto Reagan, after he broke the law and sold arms to terrorists.

Reagan killed a woman during Iran-Contra? Who knew?

> But neither of those things answers the actual question posed, does it, 
> counselor?

No, it doesn't answer the question because the question asked for
Democrats, idiot.