From: Obveeus <>
Subject: Re: [OT] Appeals Court: Forcing a Teen to Masturbate So Cops Can TakePictures Violates 4th Amendment
Full headers:
From: Obveeus <>
Subject: Re: [OT] Appeals Court: Forcing a Teen to Masturbate So Cops Can Take
Pictures Violates 4th Amendment
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:19:22 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <p0c47r$8em$>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 19:19:23 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:; posting-host="6a94134624109bc7d69ec728b2a22545";
logging-data="8662"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4XoPB/GHZjYEm9mtuRlj6"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/H5tWb6ObruFNwmxS2If2SX4dvM=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/7/2017 1:13 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
> In article<>,
>   Ed Stasiak<> wrote:
>>> BTR1701
>>> A cop engaged in the act of producing child pornography by attempting
>>> to force a teen to arouse himself while surrounded by police officers
>>> supposedly for the purpose of matching the teen's erect penis to photos
>>> the cop already had in his possession as part of a sexting "investigation".
>> W. T. F. ?…..
> It's sort of a less funny but more bizarre version of identifying the
> mole on the penis in PORKYS.

The police let another criminal slip through their fingers?