> Prev
From: Ed Stasiak <estasiak@att.net>
Subject: BAFTAs Go Batty
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.20.153 with SMTP id l25mr197644qtj.58.1514956021299;
Tue, 02 Jan 2018 21:07:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.94.215 with SMTP id s206mr49896vkb.1.1514956021078; Tue,
02 Jan 2018 21:07:01 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!g35no5915159qtk.1!news-out.google.com!t48ni2410qtc.1!nntp.google.com!g35no5915155qtk.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 21:07:00 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.192.140.152;
posting-account=Ixrd5gkAAABsU4dRz0UR13K3JpdoZL-Z
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.192.140.152
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ae97fbb1-c555-4439-babc-a369ff8790c9@googlegroups.com>
Subject: BAFTAs Go Batty
From: Ed Stasiak <estasiak@att.net>
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 05:07:01 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 62
Print Article
Forward Article
http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2016/12/19/the_bafta_awards_wil...
DEC. 19 2016

Starting in 2019, if Your Film Isn't Diverse, It Won't Be Eligible for a BAFTA Award

In an incredibly bold move, the British Academy of Film and Television Arts announced last week that,
beginning in 2019, works that do not demonstrate inclusivity in their production practices will no
longer
be eligible for the Outstanding British Film or Outstanding Debut by a British Writer, Director, or
Producer
awards at the annual BAFTAs, often considered the U.K. equivalent of the Oscars.*

Eligible projects must showcase this in two of the following ways, as the BBC reported: On-screen
characters and themes, senior roles and crew, industry training and career progression, and audience
access and appeal to underrepresented audiences. BAFTA will also remove the requirement that newly
admitted voters be recommended by two existing members.

Back in 2014, the British Film Institute established similar standards for projects seeking
National Lottery
funding in an effort to improve representation within the filmmaking industry. BAFTA's decision is
particularly
striking, however, when you hold it up against its American counterpart, the Academy of Motion
Pictures Arts
and Sciences, which, of course, faced an embarrassing PR backlash with the #OscarsSoWhite campaign
this year. Not long after the Oscar nominations revealed, for the second year in a row, a slate of
all-white
acting nominees, the academy announced that it was changing its membership rules in an effort to
address
the issue. This included shortening members' voting statuses to 10 years (able to reactivated so
long as
they remain active within the industry) and adding three more governors' seats filled by people from
underrepresented groups.

But that change was nowhere near as radical as BAFTA's, which directly addresses the bigger and more
pressing concern for representation, from acting to directing to executive opportunities, and
everything in
between. Stating, point blank, that you cannot even think about receiving these accolades from one
of film's
most prestigious institutions unless you make an effort to bring in a wider variety of collaborators
is to light
a much-needed fire under the filmmakers' butts. It won't solve every issue overnight—surely
somewhere
out there there's a filmmaker, or a funder, who really, truly doesn't care about awards—but it's a
step in the
right direction. As we've seen countless times, counting on people in power to do the right thing
while letting
them go unchecked does not lead to progress, and even hinders it.

Many people will undoubtedly find this move to be blasphemous, leaning on the tired crutch of
"artistic freedom"
to label BAFTA as intrusive. They can live and die by that sword if they'd like, but they'll only be
proving that
they're not quite as creative or imaginative as they claim to be.