From: RichA <>
Subject: Re: BBC: Two men arrested for "wrong-speak" in England
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id u9mr20039234qtu.6.1520554553130;
Thu, 08 Mar 2018 16:15:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id l124mr3114662vke.0.1520554552982;
Thu, 08 Mar 2018 16:15:52 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 16:15:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <p7ru7a$gv$>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=;
References: <> <p7ru7a$gv$>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: BBC: Two men arrested for "wrong-speak" in England
From: RichA <>
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:15:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 18
Print Article
Forward Article
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 13:08:45 UTC-5, Adam H. Kerman  wrote:
> RichA<> wrote:
> >
> Do you ever read these articles? The chants were taking place in a
> residence hall outside this female student's door. Yes: I agree. That
> would be a crime. If that had been the United States, no, that's not a
> public forum and therefore not protected speech.
> >Youtube attacked over "wrong-speak" video:
> >
> What if, say, Anti-Defamation League posted such a video as evidence of
> the kind of speeches given by certain people? Would that have been
> blocked too?

I don't believe anyone should be jailed for saying anything that isn't a direct threat to injure.