From: trotsky <>
Subject: Re: WE GO ON (no spoilers)
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id t56mr1103059qte.23.1509577851303;
Wed, 01 Nov 2017 16:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: WE GO ON (no spoilers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
References: <59f8f58f$0$35589$b1db1813$>
From: trotsky <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <59f8f58f$0$35589$b1db1813$>
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <_vsKB.217985$8%2.93100@fx08.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 23:10:50 UTC
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 18:10:50 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 1296
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3144440771
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Original-Bytes: 1234
Print Article
Forward Article
On 10/31/17 5:13 PM, moviePig wrote:
> A young man with a debilitating death-unwish sets out to peek behind the 
> curtain of mortality ...with his skeptic mother in tow.  That cheeky 
> premise sets in motion the little horror thriller WE GO ON.  It's 
> apparently a streaming-only release for now, and indeed its production 
> feels rather slight.  But there's smart inventiveness at work here, and 
> with no real missteps.  Worth finding, and solidly recommended.

What makes it so little?