From: alvey <alvey@is.invalid>
Subject: Re: Good Time (US) 2017
Full headers:
From: alvey <alvey@is.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Good Time (US) 2017
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:53:54 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <l292sntpcl0n$.1iau8q95xpjqo$>
References: <> <59fb817c$0$46137$b1db1813$> <> <59fb8e8e$0$34669$b1db1813$>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="a303e31fdbf38b1aa5124d3da460fa00";
logging-data="5860"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX194XxlSZC3nnXHjP/MfgvXh"
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 171102-0, 02/11/2017), Outbound message
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7pOmEzzeON9lbQv56BwrIIBMlOo=
Print Article
Forward Article
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 17:30:53 -0400, moviePig wrote:

> On 11/2/2017 5:03 PM, william ahearn wrote:
>> On Thursday, November 2, 2017 at 4:35:10 PM UTC-4, moviePig wrote:
>>> Looks positively good enough to queue...
>> Really interesting take on the crime film because it isn't really a
>> take. Pretty original script and production.
> That would explain its failure in theaters.

That could also be due to critics writing things like; "[Good Time] is a
standard crime caper/heist movie featuring the kinds of twists, bad
decisions, and downbeat ending that often pass for an indie film