Subject: Re: Weinstein fights dismissal, Weinstein co. pulls movie
In article <otie3q$l11$3@dont-email.me>,
Dimensional Traveler<dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
> On 11/3/2017 11:15 AM, A Friend wrote:
> > In article <oti11u$g78$2@dont-email.me>, Dimensional Traveler
> ><dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/2/2017 10:15 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
> >>> In article <otgm4o$197$1@dont-email.me>, Obveeus<Obveeus@aol.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 11/1/2017 11:27 PM, Obveeus wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 11/1/2017 11:15 PM, RichA wrote:
> >>>>>> The Weinstein Company Pulls Horror Movie ‘Polaroid’ From November
> >>>>>> Release
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 31 October 2017 7:04 PM, PDT | Variety - Film News | See recent
> >>>>>> Variety - Film News news »
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The Weinstein Company has removed horror-thriller movie “Polaroid�
> >>>>>> from its Nov. 22 release date with no explanation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Explanations other than someone pointing out to them that Halloween is
> >>>>> in October...and that Thanksgiving weekend horrors usually involve
> >>>>> relatives and turkey?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Harvey Weinstein Contests Termination From The Weinstein Co. in
> >>>>>> Arbitration
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 5 hours ago | The Hollywood Reporter - Movie News | See recent The
> >>>>>> Hollywood Reporter - Movie News news »
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Harvey Weinstein has served a demand for arbitration on The Weinstein
> >>>>>> Co. and is challenging his termination. The demand was quietly filed
> >>>>>> at Jams on Oct. 25.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The revelation comes in a footnote in court papers filed Wednesday in
> >>>>>> Delaware Chancery Court. There, Weinstein is demanding TWC hand over
> >>>>>> personnel and employment records.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> TWC has now responded to Weinstein's request for expedited treatment
> >>>>>> by attacking his lawsuit as "motivated by an improper, personal
> >>>>>> purpose" and "not in the Company's best interests for Weinstein to
> >>>>>> have immediate access to the documents sought."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Um...really? So the 'defense' doesn't have a right to access the
> >>>>> witnesses until after the 'prosecution' is done forming the narrative
> >>>>> for them?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Arbitration seems like a good route if the company is to be spared
> >>>>> total
> >>>>> implosion.
> >>>>
> >>>> Paz De La Huerta (BOARDWALK EMPIRE) is the latest woman to accuse Harvey
> >>>> Weinstein of rape...twice in 2010. NYPD may bring charges in this case:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/boardwalk-empire-actress-clai...
> >>>> ve
> >>>> y-w
> >>>> einstein-raped-her-twice-1054500
> >>>>
> >>>> (rec.arts.tv) added as a newsgroup.
> >>>
> >>> Okay, so the first time, she invited him up to her apartment and he
> >>> raped her and she didn't tell anybody.
> >>>
> >>> The second time, she invited him up to her apartment and did the deed
> >>> willingly, but is claiming she was too drunk to actually form consent.
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, that's gonna be a tough prosecution.
> >>>
> >> Much like PIV is rape, any social interaction with Harvey is rape.
> >
> > Paz is probably going to have a tough time on the stand:
> >
> > http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2012/02/paz-de-la-huerta-10-most...
> > dalous-moments/11
> >
> > And then there's the story about the tampon, which you are free to look
> > up for yourselves.
> >
> No thank you.
It's almost worth it for the comments, 100% of which call 'bullshit' on
the story.
--
Join your old RAT friends at
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1688985234647266/